[ad_1]
MEP Carmen Avram exclusively explained to DC NEWS what the consequences of the vote for an EU recovery budget could be without the agreement of Hungary and Poland, whose veto could be circumvented.
The leader of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European Parliament, German Manfred Weber, confirmed on Thursday that there are legal options for the “Next Generation” recovery plan to be implemented without the participation of Poland and Hungary.
“It is technically and legally possible. And it is achievable,” Weber said in an online meeting with foreign press correspondents in Germany. He cited an intergovernmental agreement on enhanced cooperation – a mechanism allowed by the EU Treaty – among the other 25 member states of the bloc as a possible concrete option.
Accusing Poland and Hungary of being “irresponsible” and of “playing with fire”, Weber also said that the EU’s multiannual budget for 2021-2027 could also enter into force on 1 January by circumventing their veto. countries, but in a so-called emergency mode. This would mean, Weber says, that some budget chapters may not be available, such as cohesion policy funds, which would also affect the two countries.
SEE ALSO EARTHQUAKE IN THE EU. Weber announces “Next generation”, without Poland and Hungary
What consequences would the plan have? Carmen Avram, explanations for DC NEWS
“I understand that the Lisbon Treaty voted on a possibility that was then destined for another measure, and that it was a concept of an intergovernmental agreement on enhanced cooperation, and it seems that the provisions of that paragraph, voted on at the time, could be applied in the current situation.
This provision refers to fiscal measures, and therefore could not be applied under any conditions, but when it comes to money, it is possible that in another situation a deadlock will be avoided again by applying the same measure. It is an extremely complicated problem for the EU. On the one hand, Poland and Hungary are opposed to cross compliance, on the other, it is the others who support this measure. There are even fewer voices, it is true, that it is still a measure that should be regulated in some way, because it does not exist in the Treaties. States cannot be conditioned to receive money as long as they contribute to the budget. There are also problems with the fact that the judicial systems in every country are under the authority of every state and it is not possible to enforce how the legislation is adopted in one state or another, “Carmen Avram told DC. NEWS.
Warning for other states
“I think it is a stalemate, because it opens a door to a world, to a history of the European Union that we cannot anticipate, we cannot analyze, because it is unprecedented. The future course of the EU can be in many directions. It really depends on how Poland and Hungary get back to the negotiating table. If you avoid them now, you risk creating dissension and change of attitude among the people of the two countries. People will wonder why they suffer from it, why they have been in the EU for so many years. Eventually, all people will suffer. And then, it is a very, very sensitive issue, which raises some caveats.
What is happening now with Hungary and Poland, moving to a budget vote without them, is also a warning to anyone else who tries to refuse, at some point, or to oppose any conditionality that might occur along the way. Street. for other events“, said the MEP.
Hungary and Poland have called for negotiations from Germany. “It would give water to the mill of extremists”
The Social Democrat MP does not believe that Hungary and Poland can be sanctioned by cutting European funds, which is why negotiations with the two states are continuing. He warns, however, that too harsh a measure would give water to extremists.
“I think we will continue to negotiate with them separately until they get them in line. Or maybe they’ll give them another chance. I don’t think they can exclude Hungary and Poland from the EU budget. I think it would give water to the mill of extremists in all countries! It would give a lot of strength to those who oppose receiving the money as it has been given up to now. They won a bit in the negotiations, but not at all. It gives water to the mill and to the extremists, but also to those who feel even stronger and will put even harsher conditions.
If I am not mistaken, however, Germany is continuing talks with the two states and I think that something can be achieved by the end of the Council Presidency. Hungarians and Poles are very good players, “concluded Carmen Avram.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
