[ad_1]
Recently “Get a vaccine” AstraZeneca-Oxford University, which was announced stating it is cheaper than a cup of coffee with its motto, said it was up to 90 percent efficient.
According to New York Times news reports, Astrazeneca using the phrase “ up to 90 percent ” when announcing the corona virus vaccine, the lack of some information about the vaccine in the statement, and questions as to why the first vaccine was given halfway. dose aroused curiosity. The side of Astrazeneca and the experts have made statements on the subject.
‘WE MADE A MISTAKE IN VACCINE DOSAGE’
The AstraZeneca side acknowledged that the vaccine information was incomplete, when asked whether further tests would continue to obtain new information, and that they made mistakes in dosing the vaccine injected into participants in the latest vaccine trials.
Many scientists and industry experts have pointed out that AstraZeneca’s initial shortcomings in the way the data were disclosed, the way the vaccine was administered, eroded their confidence in the reliability of the results.
REDUCED THE POSSIBILITY OF GIVING PERMIT FOR USE IN AN EMERGENCY
Officials in the United States pointed out that vaccine results, which are announced up to 90%, do not reflect data from the elderly, but the results are unclear. Authorities say approval authorities in the United States or other countries are less likely to quickly grant emergency use of the vaccine to AstraZeneca – University of Oxford, and this was an unexpected setback.
‘THEY HAVE POOR DEGREES IN TRANSPARENCY AND PRECISION’
Natalie Dean, biostatistician and vaccine study design specialist at the University of Florida, “I cannot understand where and how all the information disclosed was collected” She said. AstraZeneca and Oxford “When it comes to the vaccine trial results they reported, they scored poorly in transparency and meticulousness.” He wrote.
SOURCE: NTV
.
[ad_2]
Source link
