[ad_1]
Elements of the candidacy of the still president of the United States, Republican Donald Trump, continue to seek evidence of electoral fraud to overturn the presidential results, but all attempts so far have failed.
During a court hearing in Pennsylvania this week, a judge questioned attorney Jonathan Goldstein that evidence of election fraud was found among the 592 ballots contested by Trump’s candidacy.
Pennsylvania was one of the states where Democratic candidate and now president-elect, Joe Biden, managed to “turn the page,” securing the 20 constituency votes that dictated the November 3 presidential victory, according to media projections. . North American media, including the New York Times or CNN, among others.
For one of the candidates to win, he must get at least 270 votes from the constituency, out of a total of 538.
For this reason, this very important state in “electoral mathematics” was one that saw counting as the goal of a process that disputes the veracity of the results and that points to the Democrats as alleged perpetrators of manipulation. However, regarding the suspected adulteration of the 592 contested ballots in that state, the prosecutor replied that no evidence of election fraud was found.
“Accusing people of fraud [eleitoral] it’s a big step, “Goldstein said, quoted by the Associated Press (AP).
Trump, for his part, has not been cautious about the allegations, systematically arguing that the election results are fraudulent and that he would be the right winner if only “real votes” were counted.
These votes referenced by the still US head of state refer to the votes of voters who chose to vote on election day, November 3. However, Americans had other types of voting methods available, namely early voting and by mail.
With no plausible evidence that there was, in fact, election fraud, the president maintains the allegations, despite elements of the nationwide American Electoral Commission, from both parties, have already denied the allegations and confirmed that there were no conspiracies to “steal” the victory from Trump.
On Wednesday, the president turned his attention to Philadelphia, one of the strongholds of the Democrats and which helped Biden win the 20 Pennsylvania constituency votes.
Donald Trump accused Al Schmidt, a Republican election official, on Twitter of ignoring “a mountain of corruption and dishonesty”. Twitter added to this publication a message that the content released by the President is disputed and does not serve as a fact. In all, Trump supporters have filed 15 lawsuits in Pennsylvania to try and claim the electoral college’s 20 votes.
The states of Georgia (16 votes), Arizona (11), Nevada (six) and Michigan (16) have also been subject to similar lawsuits. Biden also won in these four states.
The legality and ethics of attorney participation in this unsubstantiated allegation claim have been challenged, at a time when the pre-election verified division in the United States of America appears to continue, with Trump wanting to keep power and Biden to develop. the agenda for the next four years.
According to Justin Levitt, a Layola Law School professor and former Justice Department election official, this may “be an attempt to appease Trump’s ego”, but it has “real consequences”.
“Attempting to appease the president’s ego is not a victimless crime”, he warned.
Al Schmidt, for example, told CBS’s “60 Minutes” program that his Republican office received death threats simply for counting votes.
“Counting the votes registered on election day or earlier by qualified voters is not corruption. It is not cheating. It is democracy”, as the United States contemplates this possibility, Schmidt said in the interview, which aired last Sunday.
Trump supporters disagree, although US electoral law provides for this type of procedure, and they are funding the fund promoted by the President for this campaign.
A campaign in which Trump’s private lawyer Rudy Giuliani, Jay Sekulow, a prosecutor also involved in the dismissal process that the president faced, and David Bossie, a non-lawyer candidate are also involved. If Trump supporters find evidence of election fraud, the case could reach the highest courts.
Rick Hasen, a professor and researcher at the University of California, said the appearance of big names on the Supreme Court in this scenario could indicate that there was strong evidence of election fraud, but with Giuliani and Bossie at the helm of the case, the gravity of the fraud remains questionable.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
