[ad_1]
The decision lifts the veil on the transformation Donald Trump may have accomplished in the US Supreme Court by appointing Conservative judge Amy Coney Barret in late October to fill the vacancy left by the death of liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg the previous month. A few minutes before midnight on Wednesday, the The judge gave the casting vote which allowed the restrictions on religious services to be lifted imposed by Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, to fight the Covid-19 pandemic, writes the New York Times
In addition to Barrett, four other judges voted against these restrictions. The remaining four judges that make up the Supreme Court, including the president himself, John Roberts, disagreed. However, the 5-4 vote dictated the lifting of the restrictions.
It’s hard to believe that admitting more than 10 people to a 400-seat church or synagogue would create a more serious health risk than the many other activities the state has. [de Nova Iorque] allows ”, reads the decision of the Supreme.
IS decision is completely contrary to the previous ones taken by the same court in respect of the states of California and Nevada, issued prior to the death of Judge Ginsburg. These decisions supported the restrictions on religious services even with 5 to 4 votes, with the majority of those aiming in favor of the measure.
With Judge Amy Coney Barrett in the center, the battle for the Supreme Court has begun, where everyone has glass roofs
The Governor of New York had established that, in the areas with the highest risk of contagion and in the most confirmed cases, red areas, there could be no religious services with more than 10 people. In the orange areas, these meetings were limited to 25 people. The diocese of the Roman Catholic Church in Brooklyn and Agudath Israel of America, an Orthodox Jewish organization, have resorted to these measures. And the final decision of the Supreme Court is that this measure violates the First Amendment which protects the free exercise of religion.
In the published decision, only a few judges signed their opinions – Barrett is not one of them. Among those who did, Judge Neil M. Gorsuch presents himself with an indignant speech: “It is time – it was time – to clarify that, despite the pandemic imposes many profound challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive decrees which reopen liquor and bicycle shops but which close churches, synagogues and mosques ”.
Supreme President John Roberts recalled that policy makers “They just see the issue differently after careful study and analyzes that reflect your best efforts to fulfill your responsibility under the Constitution ”. Similarly, judges Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan accused the rest of those who voted against the restrictions of being reckless. “The judges of this court play a deadly game criticizing the experts’ judgment on the environments in which a contagious virus, which now infects one million Americans a week, spreads more easily. “
[ad_2]
Source link
