There is no evidence of fraud that could have changed the presidential election result



[ad_1]

The US Department of Justice found no evidence to support allegations of widespread fraud that could have changed the outcome of last month’s presidential election, US Attorney General William Barr said in an interview with The Associated. Press, quoted by CNN.

“So far, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have given a different election result,” Barr said.

Barr, who backed incumbent President Donald Trump’s claims before the election that voting by mail is not safe, said both the Justice Department and Homeland Security Department analyzed the fraud allegations and found them. unfounded.

“There was an allegation that there was systemic fraud, meaning that the counting machines were programmed to skew the election results. The Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security have looked into this, and so far we have not seen nothing to prove it, “he said.

Barr’s remarks come weeks after a former cybersecurity official publicly rejected Trump’s claims, forcing the president to fire him.

Two attorneys working for Trump on Tuesday rejected Barr’s assessment, reiterating their claims that they have “ample evidence of illegal voting in at least six states.”

“With the utmost respect for the Attorney General, his opinion appears to be without his knowledge or without investigating substantial irregularities and evidence of systemic fraud,” lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis said in a statement.

Previously, Barr made statements similar to those made by Trump, including in September, when he condemned states that used mail-order voting during the coronavirus pandemic.

“People who try to change the rules of this method, which is subject to fraud and coercion – it’s reckless and dangerous and people are playing with fire,” Barr said at the time.

Publisher: Monica Bonea

.

[ad_2]
Source link