The US lawyer denies evidence of decisive election fraud

Shortly after the interview was published, Barr was seen in the White House and many analysts speculated that he might be leaving the government.

US Attorney General Bill Barr denied on Tuesday December 1 that there was significant election fraud in the November 3 presidential election that would invalidate Democrat Joe Biden’s victory, contrary to what President Donald Trump claims.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a sufficient scale to have changed the outcome of the election,” Barr said in an interview with the Associated Press news agency.

Barr made these statements as Trump’s campaign persists in trying to prove that there was a fraudulent vote in key states for Biden’s triumph, such as Georgia, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, in hopes of preventing the Democrats’ victory from becoming official. in the College. Election on December 14th.

Shortly after the interview was published, Barr was seen in the White House and many analysts speculated that he might be leaving the government.

Trump, who refuses to admit defeat, criticized the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the FBI (federal police) on Sunday for failing to help prove the existence of what he believes is massive fraud. “They are missing,” he told Fox News.

In several lawsuits, all rejected by the courts, the Trump campaign sought to invalidate Biden’s millions of votes based on unsubstantiated claims.

Trump’s lawyers said fake ballots were printed, thousands of deaths voted, vote-counting machines were programmed to favor Biden.

In the interview, Barr did not address specific claims.

However, he referred to the claim that the machines were programmed to distort the election results, which could be considered “systematic fraud”.

“The Department of Homeland Security and the DoJ have been investigating this, and so far we haven’t seen anything confirming it,” he said.

Barr, considered a Trump politician, said the only potentially justifiable allegations of fraud “are highly individualized in a specific set of circumstances, actors or behaviors” that have been investigated.

“They are not systemic charges and have been denied,” he said. Others “potentially include a few thousand votes. They’ve been followed up,” he said.