The rains criticize the video of alias Iván Márquez



[ad_1]

In the video he says that "it was a mistake" to have delivered the weapons.

Bogotá. The rejectionist views resulted in the video in which the former peace negotiator of the late FARC guerrilla, Luciano Marín Arango, alias & # 39; Iván Márquez, seems to say that he regrets having renounced arms without guaranteeing reincorporation of former combatants. He said that the government has not respected the agreement of Havana.

One of the first to react was the national government, which through the high councilor for post-conflict, Emilio Archila, said that "it is false that the UN Verification Mission has indicated that the Colombian government is not respecting the agreements". He added that Márquez is in the video that made public and that his statements do not correspond to the facts and do not contribute to the construction of peace, "moving away from the reality of 13,043 former combatants who have honored his word".

The former president Álvaro Uribe, one of the main opponents of the peace process with the FARC, although he did not mention the video directly, published in his Twitter account that, listening to the news, it can be concluded that impunity for terrorism it is a bad example and she is ungrateful too.

Senator of the Democratic Center Carlos Felipe Mejía assured that the reappearance of Márquez is shameless and cynical. "The narco-terrorist Iván Márquez reappears in video and cynically says that it was a mistake to put his arms, and that the capture of the mafia Santrich and the crisis in Venezuela are attacks from" the extreme right. "How about shamelessness of this bandit? ", he added.

"The mistake was to allow the crimes to go unpunished, the truth was not known and the victims not to be repaired." Descarados! "Said Oscar Ivan Zuluaga.

For his part, Ernesto Macias, president of the Senate, said that "the message of Iván Márquez from the underground (Venezuela) makes clear that the demarcation and disarmament of the Farc were partial, and the PEC does not yet justify its existence. "

[ad_2]
Source link