[ad_1]
“At this point, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could change the outcome of the election,” the Justice Department official said in an interview with the US news agency Associated Press.
Conservative Barr, a staunch supporter of outgoing President Donald Trump and one of the proponents of the theory that postal votes can be manipulated by foreign powers, said “there have been allegations of systematic fraud, according to which machines [de voto] they would have been programmed to distort the election results. “
The US Department of Justice and Homeland Security has investigated these allegations and “so far they have found nothing to support them,” he said.
Barr was called to the White House this afternoon, raising speculation from several commentators about a possible resignation.
On Sunday, in an interview with Fox News, Donald Trump complained about the actions of Barr and federal authorities, saying they weren’t helping him contest the findings and search for evidence of fraud: “they disappeared,” he said the outgoing president.
On Tuesday (1), William Barr said that “there is a growing trend to use the justice system as a tool to solve all problems”.
“When someone is unhappy with something, they wait for the attorney general to investigate,” he said.
Last month, Barr authorized US prosecutors to investigate “substantive allegations” of election irregularities, even before the results were certified, although there was no evidence of large-scale fraud at the time.
In the note he issued, he instructed prosecutors to circumvent the policy usually followed by the Department of Justice, which prevented this type of investigation before the results were confirmed.
The team of lawyers representing the outgoing president, led by Rudy Giuliani, said there is a conspiracy by the Democratic Party to introduce millions of illegal votes into the ballot, but without providing concrete evidence.
The main argument they have advanced in several court cases in states whose results are disputed and which could be decisive for a different outcome is that Republican observers sent to look at the tally in some polling stations failed to see the process clearly. So, they claim that illegality must have occurred.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
