Peace will come through decolonization, not rhetoric on the annual Day of Solidarity with Palestine – Middle East Monitor



[ad_1]

United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres never misses an opportunity to illustrate how the international community has disappointed Palestine and its people. November 29, International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People – or to be more precise, the anniversary of the United Nations conspiracy to allow Israel to be established as a colonial project in Palestine through the 1947 Partition Plan, established in UNGA Resolution 181 – his introductory remark was: “As the United Nations celebrates its 75th anniversary, the question of Palestine remains unresolved.”

The date of the United Nations Partition Plan was chosen for this “International Day …” – according to the organization’s website – “for its significance and importance for the Palestinian people”. There is no mention of the negative significance and significance it has for Palestinians. In a time of unparalleled hypocrisy, the United Nations describes Solidarity Day as “an opportunity for the international community to focus its attention on the fact that … the Palestinian people have yet to achieve their inalienable rights as defined by the General Assembly. , ie self-determination without external interference “.

In the rhetoric of the United Nations, the Partition Plan does not constitute “external interference”. Not even the fact that such UN interference has favored Zionist colonialism which has turned Palestinians into colonized people and refugees. Decades later, the United Nations has completely dissociated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the perpetrators and, more importantly, from the international accomplices of this colonial violence.

TO READ: The EU’s reaction to the settlements and security coordination reflects the PA’s betrayal of Palestine

Completely forgotten, the duty of the United Nations on this particular day is simply to act as an information booth as per its own admission, with rhetoric to celebrate the occasion, meetings and film screenings. It shows all the traps of a marketing and PR agency rather than an international body wielding political power to stop Israel if it really wants to. Which, of course, he has no intention of doing.

So, as Guterres and his hierarchy preside over the ongoing destruction of Palestine, thus perpetuating the cycle of land grabbing and dispossession of the Palestinian people, it is not time for all who oppose the machinations of the United Nations to stop marking this occasion. symbolic as if it were something truly meaningful and positive? Stop exploiting Palestinians by attending a commemoration orchestrated by an international organization that refuses to distinguish between colonizer and colonized and that has normalized the lack of a just resolution to accommodate Israel’s presence in Palestine, as well as its false “self. “. -defence and security “narrative.

There is nothing honorable about a day when the international community celebrates its complicity against the Palestinian people and the theft of their homeland. If the Palestinians are to be truly celebrated, the UN commentary on “self-determination without external interference” must be taken seriously, to the point that November 29 becomes an annual opportunity to convince the international community to account for the grave violations of the international law against the Palestinian people, under the auspices of the same law he loves to quote.

Palestinians need the relevant spaces for their narratives to create politics for their land and people. The UN will not obey, of course, but there is no reason not to create new Palestinian initiatives for the Palestinians; initiatives that recognize that peace begins with decolonization, not with the spread of Israel’s colonial security narrative – “without outside interference” – as the United Nations itself so unwittingly stated.

TO READ: The EU has played a waiting game for Israel

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.



[ad_2]
Source link