New setback for Trump: Court rejects legal challenge on Pennsylvania elections



[ad_1]

Shortly after Friday’s ruling, Trump posted a Newsmax video on suspected election fraud in Nevada on Twitter.

Of:
Reuters

A federal appeals court on Friday 27-N denied a campaign request by United States President Donald Trump to prevent President-elect Joe Biden from being declared the winner of the state of Pennsylvania, which is another significant joke. arrest for attempting to overturn the results of the November 3 elections.

“Free and fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Accusations that they are unfair are serious. But defining an unfair election does not mean that it is, ”wrote Stephanos Bibas on behalf of a jury of three judges.

“The allegations require specific accusations and therefore evidence. We don’t have either of them here, “he added.

“Let’s go SCOTUS!” Jenna Ellis, a Trump campaign attorney, tweeted after the decision, referring to a scheduled appeal to the Supreme Court. “The activist judicial machine in Pennsylvania continues to cover up allegations of massive fraud.”

Pennsylvania certified Biden, who won the state’s popular vote, as its winner this week. According to state law, the candidate who wins the popular vote gets all 20 electoral votes in the territory.

Trump, a Republican, has refused to concede victory to his Democratic rival and continues to argue, without evidence, widespread election fraud.

But as his legal challenges bear fruit, Trump said Thursday he will leave the White House if the Electoral College votes for Biden, as close as possible to accepting defeat.

On Monday, the Trump administration paved the way for Biden to transition to the White House, giving him access to briefings and funding even as the president himself promised to continue fighting the election results.

Shortly after Friday’s ruling, Trump posted a Newsmax video on Twitter about suspected voter fraud in Nevada.

The Trump campaign presented its legal challenge in Pennsylvania earlier this month, claiming that county election officials had handled mail order ballots inconsistently and asking US District Judge Matthew Brann to stop certifying the results. .

.

[ad_2]
Source link