[ad_1]
SPIEGEL: Mr. Sabathil, the Constitution Protection Office thought you were a Chinese agent. Do you feel satisfied?
Sabathil: I am relieved, but the anger still prevails in me. I have not delivered anything in China and the investigation has not given me anything. I feel like Josef K. in the Kafka trial. Paradoxically, I know very little about my case because classifying it as a secret deprived me, as an accused, of the right to inspect certain files.
SPIEGEL: For what reasons did the federal prosecutor interrupt the proceedings?
Sabathil: The justification consists of a subordinate clause, which reads: “Not confirmed with the sufficient certainty required to bring the allegations of intelligence agency activity.”
SPIEGEL: An acquittal sounds different.
Sabathil: Legal German! This is a closure of the proceedings under Section 170, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, there is no cleaner way out of the proceedings. I am disappointed that the German constitutional state does not give me the reasons for the initial suspicion or the conclusion of the proceedings. My attorney asked to inspect the files on the day he was notified. But this has been denied us repeatedly over the past few months. My case is classified as a state secret, maybe I won’t know the whole truth for a few years, maybe never. I can’t help but get the impression that the sloppy work of the Bureau for the Protection of the Constitution must be covered up.
Source link
