Donald Trump: the immigration measures that Trump seeks to impose before his exit from the presidency – USA and Canada – International



[ad_1]


The fight for the White House seems not to be over yet. The current president of the United States, Donald Trump, still does not accept his defeat against Democrat Joe Biden, who, if the official results confirm his election, will take office on January 20 next year.

But the truth is that Trump still makes decisions in the North American country, and one issue on which he can generate changes before leaving power is that of migration. Below we will tell you about the intentions of the current president in this area.

(You Might Be Interested: Investigation Exposes Barriers to US Immigration System)

The lawyer Ángel Leal spoke with the CNN on some migration-related issues that Trump may still influence.

The first relates to “accelerated deportations, currently applied by the Immigration and Customs Control Service, which apply to those people who have been in the country for less than two years, who risk being deported”. summarily, instead of being able to appear before an immigration judge “.

The expert also refers to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provides protection for 700,000 immigrants who arrived in the United States as children and who it has recently been controversial because a New York judge dismissed restrictions imposed by the White House.

The court finds that Wolf did not legally serve as an Interim Secretary for Homeland Security under the National Security Act.

Federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis on Saturday ruled that President Donald Trump’s Acting Secretary of National Security, Chad Wolf, broke the law when he approved new rules for the DACA program in July.

(Read here: How much do you know about migration to the United States?)

Wolf determined that no new applications would be accepted and that renewals would be limited to one year instead of two.

These limitations are invalid because “the court finds Wolf was not legally serving as the acting secretary of Homeland Security under the National Security Act” when he issued them, according to the ruling.

Leal said he hopes the Biden administration can give “reassurance to young dreamers who are under the protection of the DACA and to those young people who can qualify “under this program.

The plans that Trump had

Assuming his re-election, Trump plans to enforce an even tougher immigration policy than his first four years in the White House, with limits on asylum and punishment for “sanctuary” cities, according to Stephen Miller, his principal adviser. for immigration.

(Also Read: Health Crisis Breaks Trump’s Immigration Policy)

Resolving the problems of the immigration system and restoring some degree of sanity in immigration programs require a reform of the rules

Last month, in an interview with the television network NBC, Miller highlighted four priorities, thinking about a possible second term in Trump’s immigration policy: limits on asylum, penalizing cities that protect undocumented immigrants, continuing to cut visas for some travelers, and new visa restrictions from work.

“In many cases, solving the problems of the immigration system and restoring some degree of sanity to immigration programs requires reform of the rules,” Miller said, noting that these changes do not require congressional approval.

On immigration, “Congress has delegated many powers” to the executive branch, he added.

Miller said at the time that Trump’s desire was to expand the kind of “burden-sharing” agreements signed with Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador to the world, with which asylum seekers in the United States must wait. in other countries the course of your procedures.

(Also: the implications of suspending immigration to the United States)

If secure partnerships were to be created with third parties, on other continents and in other countries and regions, one would have the ability to share the burden of asylum seekers on a global basis.

“If we build secure partnerships with third parties, on other continents and in other countries and regions, we would have the ability to share the burden of asylum seekers on a global basis,” he added.

As part of such a program, called the Migrant Protection Memorandum (MPP), since early 2019 The United States has sent tens of thousands of mostly Central American men, women and children to Mexico, who arrived at the border and presented themselves to the asylum-seeking authorities.

As for cities whose local authorities refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, known as “sanctuaries,” Miller said there would be “a big contrast to truly aggressive action.”

Background on migration

In order not to go too far, a US federal judge on Wednesday blocked the deportations of unaccompanied immigrant minors to the southern border, adjacent to Mexico, a measure that the Trump government had justified because of the covid-19 pandemic.

(Recommend: Biden denounces Trump’s irresponsibility for not accepting the results)

The lawsuit against the deportation was filed in court by the influential civil rights organization American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) on behalf of a Guatemalan teenager who fled his country because he was persecuted for his father’s political views. The boy wanted to go to the United States, where his father resides, to meet him again.

Today’s ruling is a key step to stop the Trump administration’s unprecedented and illegal attempt to expel children using public health as a pretext.

The Trump administration, which maintains a strong hand against legal and illegal immigration, adopted this policy after the start of the pandemic, relying on an old public health rule regarding border epidemic control, but according to plaintiff lawyers violates the special rights that protect minors.

District of Columbia Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan argued that affected children could suffer “irreparable harm” and also said he was not convinced by the arguments presented by the government and indicated that there are enough unused paddocks where children could be housed.

“Today’s ruling is a critical step to stop the Trump administration’s unprecedented and illegal attempt to expel children using public health as a pretext.”said Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney.

According to the ACLU, from the start of the pandemic until October, some 13,000 minors could have been deported to Mexico or their countries of origin without having had access to the asylum request.

Hence, children and adolescents could be one of the populations most affected by Trump’s immigration movements.

INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL *
* With information from AFP and Efe

It might interest you

– Trump called an attorney in Michigan in an apparent attempt to pressure

– Trump fires an election official who denied election fraud

– Trump calls for a partial recount in the key state of Wisconsin

.

[ad_2]
Source link