[ad_1]
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed President Donald Trump’s campaign team’s lawsuit against CNN over an opinion piece claiming it was ready to receive Russian aid, news.ro writes.
Judge Michael L. Brown ruled that the campaign team failed to prove that there was “real malice,” so the trial must be abandoned.
The campaign opened lawsuits in February and March for several editorials in The Washington Post, CNN and the New York Times, all about Russia’s interference in the US presidential election.
The lawsuits filed by the Washington Post and the New York Times are still pending.
In the case of CNN, the editorial by Larry Noble, a former general counsel of the Federal Election Commission, was contested. He expressed concern over an interview Trump gave on June 12, 2019 to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.
Romania is close to COLAPS in the second wave, but Japan has entered the third wave and announces a RECORD of contagions
“It’s not interference, they have information – I think I’d prefer it,” Trump said in an interview.
In the editorial published the next day, Noble said the president was again calling on foreign powers to intervene.
“The Trump campaign has once again assessed the potential risks and benefits by seeking Russia’s help in 2020 and has decided to leave this option open,” Noble wrote.
Trump’s campaign team said the statement in the article was false and defamatory and that its representatives had repeatedly disapproved of Russian assistance.
In an attempt to dismiss the complaint, CNN said Noble expressed his opinion based on public data, not making a guess. Brown rejected that argument and found that what Noble had written was an accusation.
Because Trump is a public figure, the campaign team was forced to prove intent, which Noble made the imprudent statement not to consider if it was true. He emphasized the idea by quoting a message posted to Noble on Twitter: “Trump is deceiving and lying, and when he is discovered, he lies again and claims he has the right to make the rules.”
But the judge ruled that this was not sufficient evidence.
Brown allowed the campaign team to contest and file a complaint again.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
