[ad_1]
The journalist Cristian Tudor Popescu reacted strongly after the RCC judges decided that the cooperation protocols between the SRI and the Attorney General's Office were unconstitutional, considering that Romania is in a "state of siege".
Digi24:
The protocols of collaboration between the SRI and the Office of the Attorney General have been declared unconstitutional. Beyond the legal consequences of this RCC decision, the journalist Cristian Tudor Popescu spoke of "the state of siege in which Romania is now", as well as of the institutions that are still under the control of the Liviu party Dragnea. "Now it is clear that the goal is the total denigration of justice and SRI, starting with leadership," the journalist said.
"Now it is clear that the aim is total disregard for justice and SRI, starting with leadership.
The current Attorney General, whose dismissal is under way, the president of the International Criminal Court and Eduard Helvig, head of the current SRI, are targeted, because the 2016 protocol was partially unconstitutional signed by Helvig. As a result of the discredit of these institutions, the mood at the level of the population that wants to be induced is: if you kill someone and have fun with the feast of Dragnea, free her, maybe you get a prize, no matter justice.
Thus, this RCC decision comes after Vâlcov brought the protocol from his home in 2016, and after Iordache met the RCC in connection with the conflict between Parliament and the Prosecutor's Office, in the public opinion the idea is that the party is the one who decides on justice for anyone.
Iohannis can not oppose this continuous attack, only to delay in some cases.
Dăncilă and made the preparation, saying: if in France it is possible, to us because it can not.
When he gains control of the SRI, Dragnea's party can, with the help of SRI really turned into security, be able to track and hold those who are against Dragnea's time on time, so that it does not even reach the road, the people who will try this will be maintained.
the truth:
This is one of the variants discussed last night in various circles in Brussels and on which the reactions of those European countries that feel somehow responsible for the advancement of the European project are based. The second variant, and with vehement followers, is that, legally, without a decision of the European Council, the expiry of the United Kingdom's exit (end of March) can not be taken into consideration, so the only scenario It is possible that everyone respects the judicial proceedings and, consequently, last night's vote would mean the automatic entry into the "Brexit Tough", that is practically total madness and that will cause extremely unpleasant effects on the EU and its citizens and will push the United Kingdom to a real economic and social disaster.
The real question now is to know if the British want to accept the possibility of recognizing that they are fundamentally wrong by choosing the BREXIT perspective and are now ready to say it publicly and ask the European Union to cleanly and respectfully clean the towel in the last two years. half of the history of bilateral relations, so, therefore, perfectly hypocritical, everyone could pretend, as the so sophisticated Romanian folk wisdom says, that "neither the garlic nor the mouth nor the smell smell it!". Of course, it is more difficult to imagine a game bigger than the political principles written in books of good governance, by European citizens who, in the last two and a half years, have offered the solemn performance in which, in various scenes, they were walking – on the European taxpayers – hundreds and hundreds of officials to negotiate the text of the agreement and its legislative documents, thousands and thousands of pages, thousands and thousands of meetings, the incredible amounts of money from the community budget that are now only goodly discarded.
RFI:
The lack of an agreement would result in the reinstatement of border control posts from 29 March, the day on which the outflow of Great Britain from the EU would become effective.
This would mean restoring customs formalities, controlling goods and passengers. And for this event, it was already planned to recruit 700 additional customs officers in the next three years: 250 were already employed in 2018 or are recruiting, 350 will be used in 2019 and 100 next year.
The budget for customs will have to be supplemented by 10% in 2019.
Recreating border crossings with the United Kingdom could cause bottlenecks around these areas. And in this regard, the French ports of Dunkirk and Calais are the most important because every day 1,100 trucks cross the English Channel to the United Kingdom.
Xavier Bertrand, the president of the region of Hauts-de-France, made a calculation: "for 2 minutes of customs control for each vehicle, 27 km of traffic jams would result on both sides of the border, in the case of France, in Calais ".
In order not to arrive here, the two French ports – Dunkirk and Calais have already considered a series of measures.
The port of Boulogne-Calais will set up an area that can accommodate up to 200 bridges and where customs will be checked and another area will be dedicated to those who cross the border with live animals. In order to optimize traffic, a system of electronic customs declarations has been designed. All these preparations, only for the port of Boulogne Calais, cost about 6 trillion euros.
[ad_2]
Source link
