British press: disaster not only for Armenia but also for Russia

The Financial Times newspaper, “Ceasefire in the Caucasus, Turkey was strengthened as a force in Russia’s backyard” was titled News.

In the text it was pointed out that in a photo taken by the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry, his Turkish counterpart, Hulusi Akar, was mentioned as “Azerbaijan’s closest allied Defense Minister”.

Former Russia for former Soviet states saw “dizzying” enrollment recorded as an explanation as the most important partner, Azerbaijan and Turkey provide big gains for sustained 6-week military conflict, Baku’s regional outlook for restore it.

“A DISASTER NOT ONLY FOR ARMENIA, BUT FOR RUSSIA”

The peacekeepers sent the news highlighting the mediated truce in Moscow, “the size of the successes achieved by Azerbaijan with the support of Turkey, the Kremlin sees geopolitics as its backyard has strengthened its newfound Ankara influence in the Caucasus”. It has been said.

“The geopolitical results are disastrous not only for Armenia but also for Russia,” said Ruslan Pukhov, director of the Russian Center for Strategic and Technological Analysis, whose views were cited in the report. She said.

“AN EMBARRASSING VICTORY FOR RUSSIA FOREIGN POLICY”

The Russian region that will send peacekeeping forces, “a deceptive foreign policy victory” qualifying as Pukhov, “The sad truth is. Trans-Caucasus Moscow penetration has declined dramatically, Turkey’s success and ambitious prestige, al contrary incredible degrees increased. “used the expression.

The ceasefire that Russian President Vladimir Putin has reiterated his role as indispensable regional referees, but it is Russia, “which has cost Turkey recognition as a geopolitical actor in the Caucasus,” he said. Turkey for its support in Baku in Moscow has been stressed for 25 years that it breaks the balance on a balance problem.

“A RESPONSE TO RUSSIAN ACTIONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST”

With Azerbaijan’s support for Turkish Moscow, where risk-taking is a calculation, it would intervene militarily in the conflict and would rightly be highlighted in the text, “And thanks to the large Baku regional gains, the actual borders in the post-Soviet space at Moscow is the only military power to redesign it. Proven. “Statement was included.

Another expert Stanislav Pritch said: “Turkey’s actions in Nagorno-Karabakh stating that in part a response to Russia’s actions in the Middle East,” Turkey wants to be a global player and have a say in everything. She said.

“RUSSIA NO LONGER SEEMS THE GREATEST POWER IN THE REGION”

On the other hand, the BBC provided a report on its website to an article by Alexander Gabuev of the Carnegie Moscow Center think tank.

“Russia and Turkey as the winners of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict were” in an article entitled, the Karabakh war on Turkey, the strategic importance of Ankara as a showcase showing a growing role in the Southern Caucasus “.

In the article, in which it was recorded that the Turkish army trained and equipped the victorious Azerbaijani army, it was noted that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan clearly expressed his diplomatic support for Azerbaijan.

The inscription of the victory in Turkey revealed that it has gained important influence in the region, “there is an accusation of diplomatic victory by Moscow. The war, an increase in Turkish influence in the Caucasus and showed that Russia does not looks more like the only great power in the region. ” statements were included.