[ad_1]
The appeal of Donald Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice” was to not see Trump discover dormant corporate talent. Rather, Trump and his audience enjoyed watching failures as their dreams exploded and received their well-deserved verdict: “You’re fired” was the line Trump spat, which was followed by the departure of humiliated candidates and destroyed.
No wonder many Trumps now also call this phrase the guillotine. Trump himself, it can be assumed, also feels fired.
Never give up, always attack, this is what he called the secret of his success in “The Art of the Deal”. But a choice is not a negotiation of the umpteenth million dollar loan or the price of a property, a choice is not a “bargain”. One wins, one loses, and now Trump has lost and is at the end of his art.
But Trump apparently does not understand that the US political tradition provides golden bridges for the big losers in politics, especially the rare cases of presidents being eliminated after just one term, who only have to cross. The most important is the “concession speech”, the public admission of electoral defeat. It is not walk of shame, as Trump apparently believes, but an almost magical ritual that allows the underdog to at least externally transform all that is terrible and shameful of defeat into charm and sympathy points. And even more: the elected president not only admits his defeat, but regains the capacity to act. He declares the electoral campaign over, resets the counter with his deficit of votes and demonstrates with his congratulations to his successor that he is returning from the role of victim to the role of head of state.
It is not just about the salvation of the loser. A humiliated president would weaken the country until the successor in office. Should a people, half of whom are now facing a conflict of loyalty, follow their candidate or the new president? – could destabilize the country. And the office itself must be protected from undignified disputes.
In any case, the country treats its former presidents with benevolence, no matter how unpopular they were in office. Many continue to call you “Mr. President” as if the title were awarded for life. In the first few years after their departure, they can take care of the presidential libraries build monuments by yourself. It is often as if the stigma of defeat has already been discounted as a pity reward when evaluating former presidents. Anything good that inferior candidates do is credited to them twice, since they could hide insulted or make money in companies.
This is how the rather unfortunate presidents or vice-presidents later became older statesmen and the nation’s moral conscience: Jimmy Carter was awarded the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize for his human rights initiative. Al Gore, who lost to George W. Bush in 2000, got it in 2007 for his efforts to fight climate catastrophe.
Trump alone does not make sense to win by losing: he has not even thanked his supporters. If he admitted defeat, he could regain his dignity, until he does, he loses it every day – after all, in front of half the country that didn’t vote for him.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
