Donald Trump: allegations of fraud after US elections so far without evidence



[ad_1]

The world had to wait a long time for a result after election day. From the weekend, however, it was clear: Democrat Joe Biden will be the next president of the United States. Incumbent Donald Trump doesn’t want to admit it. For days, he has been spreading unfounded accusations of manipulation. In five states where Biden has been declared the winner, his campaign team is taking action against the result due to alleged irregularities. So far there is not enough evidence to support the allegations.

As the “Washington Post” reports, Trump’s campaign team has called on supporters of the president to donate money that will be used to take legal action against alleged election fraud. In fact, several states have pending lawsuits over the elections. In this, the Washington Post reports, it is not about Trump’s repeated allegations of an electoral conspiracy against him. There is also no talk of large-scale election fraud.

Instead, the complaints focus on individual voter groups and details. However, Trump’s team was unsuccessful in court.

The group failed in the beginning Pennsylvania in court. Challenger Biden could win with the help of postal votes. However, the team wanted to stop counting there by court order. The reason was that Republican observers would be denied access to the vote count. The accusation was wrong. A judge dismissed the case.

However, Trump’s Pennsylvania team was able to score small wins in court. So election observers were forced to approach the counting machines. However, this step was not decisive for the elections.

The Supreme Court also ruled that ballots in Pennsylvania that arrive after polling stations close must be kept separate and counted. This makes it easier not to include them in the final count if they need to be invalidated. Judge Samuel Alito ran the race on Friday at the request of the Republicans. The authorities had already collected the ballots separately.

In several Pennsylvania cities, Republicans also wanted to prevent local election officials from publishing the names of voters whose mail-order votes had been rejected due to errors such as missing a signature. Local counties publish names so voters can correct mistakes on their ballots. These lawsuits were also unsuccessful.

Court dismisses cases in Michigan and Georgia

Also in Michigan Biden was initially behind Trump, but was then able to transform the state after postal votes were counted. Republicans have complained of wrongdoing in counting in two lawsuits. However, because they were unable to prove it, they failed in both cases in court.

The day after the election, Trump’s team showed up Georgia filed a lawsuit related to the strict postal vote in Chatham County. According to an election official, ballot papers that arrived late were confused with documents received on time. Georgia Democrats filed two affidavits from other election officials that contradicted him.

The case was eventually dismissed due to lack of evidence. According to the Washington Post, confusing the ballots would not have a decisive impact on the final result.

Pen controversy in Arizona

In the state Arizona a controversy arose over the pens used. There Trump supporters feared their ballots were not being counted correctly because the color of the markers was likely blurry. Officials said, however, that the quick-drying color of the markers was ideal. The lawsuit has since been dropped.

In Arizona, however, another lawsuit is pending, also relating to counting machines. Trump’s team complained that poorly readable ballot papers were not handled properly. According to the Washington Post, a senior government official sees this as another delay tactic. The chances of success of the cause are not counted.

The Trump team’s legal efforts in the state are also unlikely to be successful Nevada to have. There a group close to the president claimed two days after the election that thousands of people had voted illegally.

Evidence of this has not been produced. Instead, the plaintiffs filed a single woman who claims her postal vote was stolen. In fact, the woman was offered to cancel her absentee vote and to vote again. However, it didn’t.

Now there is still a dispute over the votes of citizens who do not currently live in the state. In Nevada, however, some constituencies can vote even if they temporarily reside elsewhere. This rule applies to students and members of the military, among others.

Icon: the mirror

[ad_2]
Source link