[ad_1]
U.S. Republicans are desperately looking for evidence to support President Donald Trump’s allegations that there was massive fraud in the lost elections. So far there are no signs of this. Now Republicans are apparently also losing a key witness whose testimony they wanted to back up their allegations.
As reported by the US media, a post office employee in the state of Pennsylvania withdrew his grave allegations of alleged election fraud. Clerk Richard Hopkins told US Post investigators, there had been no manipulation of the postal ballots.
In its report, the Washington Post relied on three people familiar with the investigation and a statement from the relevant committee of the United States House of Representatives. The “New York Times” also reported the poll results. Hopkins then confirmed his new statement with his signature.
The postal worker in Erie, Pennsylvania said a manager had tampered with postal ballot papers by backdating them. So these should presumably be validated. Prominent Republican Lindsey Graham, head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, upheld the allegations and therefore justified her request for an investigation. Meanwhile, Attorney General William Barr has allowed prosecutors to conduct such investigations, albeit with the restriction that only substantiated charges should be made.
The post office clerk had initially confirmed his claims with an affidavit. According to Democrats in the House of Representatives, they were published by the right-wing platform “Project Veritas”. It is known for spreading false or misleading information. Republicans found the allegations credible, but no evidence was presented.
According to the Washington Post report: Employee posts contradict video
In a further twist, Hopkins posted a video on YouTube Tuesday night contradicting the Washington Post report. He did not withdraw his statements. However, he did not respond to requests from the newspaper.
The allegations had quickly become part of the efforts of Trump and his followers to legally challenge the electoral defeat. They involve allegations of fraud and have sued the count in several states, but have provided no evidence. The main problem here is the large number of postal votes, which in many places were still counted after election day. Numerous claims have already been refuted. The “New York Times” made an effort to investigate all states in the United States and received no information on the irregularities.
Source link
