Will the blockchain revolutionize the way we will vote?

[ad_2][ad_1]

While cryptocurrency was created to generate specific economic freedom for individuals, a number of developers are trying to block it as a potential technology to ensure political freedom, and to increase the convenience and security of voting while potentially enhancing the same democratic structures.

Recently, South Korea began experimenting with the blockchain vote, the last of a number of jurisdictions seeking the blockchain as a potential way to introduce a 21st century voting process in a secure and transparent manner. At the beginning of this year, the Japan Times reported that the Japanese city Tsukuba introduced the blockchain vote for proposals for "social contributions" projects, while CNN reported that West Virginia introduced the vote of blockchain for overseas troops.

Digital voting is interesting as an alternative to traditional voting because it renounces the need for manual voting, the need for objective control and the necessary infrastructure to create secretariats and processes. However, the digitization of voting comes with its own set of dangers, introducing the possibility of hackers, machine errors and a confusing user interface. In theory, blockchain could correct these problems in turn by introducing indelible, transparent and self-authentic voting registers.

According to the He3 Labs blog, the startup together with Universal Tribal Partners is experimenting with a blockchain review of the governmental infrastructure of the Native American Crow tribe. The effort strives to put citizenship, vote and cadastre on a blockchain, along with cryptocurrency payments. Ignoring the Orwellian implications of putting every citizen on a self-sufficient algorithm based on his biometrics, the effort will offer a test run for the use of blockchain in the public sector. The Crow nation, like many Native American tribes, often suffers from economic and legislative insecurity towards the United States. It is hoped that blockchain technology really increases the sovereignty and control of the Korean nation over their economy.

The most revolutionary suggestions for blockchain-based democracy have perhaps been "Liquid Democracy", which is not just a blockchain-based implementation of voting, but a completely new voting system that combines the advantages of direct democracy with convenience. of the representative.

Any democracy exists in a spectrum of direct democracy, where everyone is able to vote on any policy change, towards representative democracy, where voters vote on representatives who decide on their own policies. While in an idealized democracy, perhaps everyone would be able to vote for the minutiae of every single government decision, it simply is not useful or practical, so the democracies must abstract the votes of their citizens to the delegates. The liquid democracy project, which is also called delegative democracy, sees blockchain as a way around this.

In a delegated democracy, everyone would have the ability to vote on every decision or, optionally, give the vote to a delegate of their choice. In this way, if someone had an opinion about a minute detail of a decision, he could always vote on it, but for most things they would give their vote to a delegate they trusted to take those decisions for them. This would ideally combine what is beneficial for direct democracy and what is useful for representative democracy.

While blockchain is perhaps not yet mature enough to guarantee safe voting records, and although it certainly does not have the public's confidence to support an electronic voting revolution, the voting blockchain has its utopian supporters, and the future of the blockchain in the public sector remains to be seen.

To learn more: India starts testing the electronic voting software, Russia's election watchdog is piloting the vote via blockchain

Follow Chepicap now chirping, YouTube, Telegram and Facebook!

[ad_2]Source link