[ad_1]
In the past couple of days, the performance evaluation articles on the AMD Ryzen 5000 series, which is the processor with Zen 3 architecture, have been published one after another, and the king of computers has also evaluated the Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 9 5900X (Please move here), and also analyzed the Zen 3 architecture (Please move here）。
I believe whether it is domestic or overseas reviewers, even Intel or AMD itself, there are only two words that can describe the performance conclusion of the Ryzen 5000 series: “super crazy”.
From recovery, to the plate and then beyond
AMD CEO Su Zifeng consistently emphasized the importance of hardware for the “gaming” experience at the Zen 3 and RDNA 2 conference. In fact, in the past, gaming performance has always been a scaled-down version of AMD. Zen 2 architecture has reached the level of professional software, Intel is relying on the ever-increasing advantage of high frequencies to continue to maintain the status of “king” in this field. It has also become a major focus of Intel’s external marketing for more than a year: “We’re the CPU used to play.”
However, no one thought the Ryzen 5000 relied solely on changes in architecture. Provided that the semiconductor manufacturing process was not substantially improved, the innovative Zen 3 came out that was beyond imagination. After the frequency was increased, Intel was punched from the playing field. The altar was “knocked down”. It’s just that AMD has beaten Intel and the punch is very heavy indeed!
The outside world compares the product positioning of Intel and AMD. It has always been R3, R5, R7 and R9. For i3, i5, i7 and i9, not to mention the price comparison, regardless of whether they are sibling things, in fact, Zen 2 In the era, Ryzen 7 3700 and 3800 series already have the potential to benchmark Core-i9.
When it comes to Zen 3 CPU, purely in terms of gaming performance, comprehensive evaluation of domestic and foreign media, AMD actually also R5 5600X, has the strength to compete head-on with i9-10900K.
Use effective speech to be heard
When AMD has “approached” Intel Core-i9 via the R5 processor, this situation is no longer a matter of product positioning, price or experience.
Before the launch of the Zen 2 architecture, there was a long period of time. The advantages of the Core i have caused consumers to ignore AMD processors. Intel also expanded ecosystem cooperation to find game makers who did the best job. Of course there is further cooperation in the field of professional tools. Computer users at that time knew very well that if they used Intel’s CPU, software and games on the PC they would have the best experience.
However, what did Intel use to bring these partners together to maintain its edge in the PC software ecosystem? In fact, they are two simple words: efficiency.
As the saying goes, “Watermelon lurks on the big side”, anyone with good CPU performance and who can have an edge in computing, the cooperative producer will naturally favor anyone. This is a business principle that hasn’t changed forever.
In the same software and gaming situation, AMD has actually surpassed Intel in terms of performance meters, and in the current situation where Intel has the edge of the developer ecosystem, many manufacturers are sure to start thinking about who they should partner with next. Object.
Perhaps many computer enthusiasts would like to ask: Intel, do you really know what happened?
Not doing it is worse than doing it wrong
The benefits of the ecosystem built by Intel are gradually disappearing, but this is not because Intel did something wrong, but because Intel did nothing. To be fair, if it’s the former, it might still be a scene the outside world is more willing to see.
When you are willing to move towards innovation and pursue efficiency, even if the results are not what you expected, you can still get the applause of enthusiasts. AMD’s Zen architecture has evolved and changed every time, and every detailed analysis can see the surprises AMD prepares for the outside world. This is always surprising. The audacity and courage of AMD engineers.
On the other hand, Intel has always stressed in recent years that in a certain app I can beat the opponent “by a small margin”, but there is almost no single-digit percentage of the somatosensory gap, it is a bit irritating to see in the rankings . Sad; or in games, Intel always claims to have a slight edge … Oh sorry, Intel’s edge in gaming seems to have vanished now.
Isn’t it okay to squeeze the toothpaste?
AMD is already planning its next step everywhere. For example, it is built for the next generation game console via Zen and RDNA. It is convenient to share the same architecture with the PC, so as to establish an advantage in optimizing future gaming works. Or continue to use open technology to attract more developers to actively participate; alsoExcessive acquisition of XilinxIt also has its key strategic significance.
So where will Intel go? We’re afraid Intel doesn’t know about this problem either, but what the outside world wants to see is definitely not that little bit of effective toothpaste.
I believe that as long as Intel tries to make a different attempt than the past, it will certainly raise expectations. As for consumers, no one hopes that this red-blue dispute will once again appear one-sided.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
