[ad_1]
The British have particularly criticized the way this successful Netflix series, which presents the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, describes the relationship between Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, and his first wife, Princess Diana.
The fourth season of “The Crown” presents the moment of “Lady Di’s” entry into the British royal family: actress Emma Corrin plays the role of a lonely girlfriend, then that of a distressed wife in front of a cold and unfaithful, still in love with his first girlfriend, Camilla.
The creator of the series “The Crown”, Peter Morgan, has taken on the fictional part of this production, especially for the more intimate scenes, causing an extensive exercise of “fact check” among fans every season.
But for many biographers of the monarchy and close relatives of the British royal family, the British manufacturer went too far this time.
“The Crown” “makes Diana a victim and Charles a negative character, as they were both victims,” said indignant British royal history specialist Penny Junor. In particular, he blames the fact that the series blamed Princess Diana’s bulimia on her marriage to Charles and that this production claims that Queen Elizabeth II’s eldest son continued to have an affair with Camilla soon after his marriage to Diana.
“The way Charles is presented is slander,” according to The Times, several friends of the British prince.
The whole series is a “vitriolic attack” on Charles, added Dickie Arbiter, a former press officer at Buckingham Palace.
In The Guardian newspaper, royal biographer Hugo Vickers also denounces a “totally biased” season of “The Crown” series. An affective charge for Ioannis Deroide, historian and author of “L’Angleterre en series”, the relationship between Prince Charles and Diana, as presented in “The Crown”, remains “probable”.
In the opinion of this French writer, beyond the “truth” of each person, “the role played in the general dynamics of the royal family” is the most interesting aspect, and from this point of view the new season of “The Crown “has a very good performance.
Ioannis Deroide explains the virulent reaction of a part of the British public through the “emotional charge” that continues to surround the events presented in the new production.
“In previous seasons, there was talk of old events and sometimes of forgotten characters,” so debates over truthfulness were in the realm of “controversies between biographers,” the French writer said. “But the new season is about recent things that have deeply affected the collective consciousness,” he said.
The failed marriage between Diana and Charles remains a very sensitive issue after the tragic death of the Princess of Wales in Paris in 1997. Since then the heir to the British throne, who has since married Camilla, has managed to rehabilitate her public image.
Penny Junor regrets the approach used this season in “The Crown”, which she considers “extremely harmful” to the princely couple Charles-Camilla, who will one day reign in the UK: “Many people, both in the United Kingdom In Great Britain and around the world, they will consider “The Crown” a faithful testimony, but this production is not a true story, but a fiction “.
“Moral Responsibility” Mail on Sunday, the Sunday supplement of the Daily Mail, has launched a campaign asking Netflix to clarify that “The Crown” belongs to the realm of fictional productions.
On Sunday, the publication was backed by British Culture Minister Oliver Dowden, who feared “an entire generation of viewers who have not experienced those events might confuse this fiction with reality.”
“The Crown” has a “moral responsibility” to ensure that its audiences don’t confuse the series with a documentary, said famous British actress Helena Bonham Carter, who plays the British ruler’s sister Princess Margaret.
The same opinion was held by Princess Diana’s brother, Charles Spencer, who has no close relationship with the royal family. “It’s a bit ridiculous,” Ioannis Deroide said. Despite the “impressive mimicry” of the sets and costumes, there is still the risk, in his opinion, that the series will be considered a documentary, especially for the celebrity enjoyed by the actors distributed in this production.
“The Crown” is just one of many elements that allow the British to compose their own vision of the royal family. I don’t think this show alone can make people say Charles is a charming guy or vice versa, “he added.” The role of a series is not exact. Historians also practice reconstitution, because we can never reproduce the past, “added the French writer.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
