[ad_1]
An "Internet court" in Hangzhou, eastern China, will soon allow admission of evidence recorded on blockchain (or distributed records) in the event of alleged copyright infringement by a writer, China.org relationships.
The Hangzhou court is one of three Internet courts recently established in China to cope with a growing number of Internet-based crimes committed by some of the 800 million Chinese citizens now online.
The other two Internet courts are located in Beijing and Guangzhou, political and commercial centers.
The problems faced in the country's Internet courts include problems with online purchases and services, microloans, copyright infringement, online rights violations, domain name disputes, and "other Internet or administrative cases relating to the Internet designated by the higher courts".
It seems that the evidence in these courts can also be convened online.
In September, the People's Supreme Court of China declared that it will recognize the evidence presented for the cases judged in the country's new online justice system, if such proof has been established and securely archived on a secure distributed database type (blockchain or DLT ).
The city of Hangzhou was designed to accommodate writers:
"Hangzhou is home to many, if not most, online writers in China. A total of 107 famous online writers have signed contracts to create works in a" village of writers "in the city's Binjiang district."
According to Wang Jiangqiao, a judge from the Internet court in Hangzhou, the prosecution of the theft of online writing has proved difficult in the past because screenshots and downloaded content used as evidence are not credible enough.
Notary and legal fees can also make the search for justice prohibitively expensive for writers.
The new court, however, believes that the evidence recorded on a "blockchain" or on a distributed database is more difficult to falsify or tamper with, "due to its decentralized technology and open ledger distributed":
"Therefore, all fingerprints stored in the system of judicial blockchain – paternity, creation time, content and evidence of infringement – have legal effect".
Critics of the claims on the "blockchain panacea", however, argue that the technology is overwritten and can not maintain the same features of immutability in an atmosphere of central supervision, where a corrupt administrator could modify the information recorded on a chain.
Bitcoin developers like Jimmy Song have long argued that Bitcoin's main innovation is its ability to protect data without a superintendent – automatically and automatically – but this feature, says Song, is made questionable when a "blockchain" is handled privately.
The Chinese government, however, is exploring technology for many of its administrative systems, as well as one of the bases of a social credit score system that hopes to have full operational by 2020.
In this system, profiling data on Chinese citizens are collected from their expenses, online and public activities and are used to calculate a favorable or unfavorable score.
Data collected for the Chinese social credit system includes information on an individual's "politeness" towards the Chinese regime and that of their members.
Chinese social credit scores are already used to simplify or deny a person's access to credit and public services, including public transport.
China is also piloting a project using "blockchain" to trace words in the city of Zhongshan, in southern China.
[ad_2]Source link
