[ad_1]
NASA reveals that sending first woman and next man to the moon by 2024 is “ unlikely ” due to lack of funds, scheduling problems and the impact of coronavirus on operations
- NASA’s Artemis mission would have started in 2024, but a report says otherwise
- The report cites a number of concerns such as funding, scheduling and scope
- NASA says it has yet to complete and test key vehicles such as the lunar lander
- Its operations were also impacted by the coronavirus pandemic
- In mid-April, NASA had to close 12 of its 18 major facilities due to the virus
- The agency had applied for $ 1.4 billion in funding and received $ 600 million
NASA first announced plans to send the first woman and next man to the moon by 2024 last year, but a new report says reaching the target date is “ unlikely ”.
The report, titled “NASA’s 2020 Top Management and Performance Challenges Report,” highlights a number of challenges including the funding, scheduling and scope of the Artemis mission.
Some of the biggest concerns relate to the mission’s key technologies, such as the production and certification of the Space Launch System rocket and the completion of the Orion crew capsule.
Among the technological limitations, NASA’s plans were affected by the coronavirus: as of mid-April, 12 of the agency’s 18 main facilities were closed and could not meet the necessary timelines.
Scroll down for the video
NASA first announced plans to send the first woman and next man to the moon by 2024 last year, but a new report says reaching the target date is “ unlikely ”
“We believe the Agency will have a hard time landing astronauts on the moon by the end of 2024,” the report reads.
At the very least, reaching a date close to this ambitious goal – and reaching Mars in 2030 – will require strong, consistent and sustained leadership from the President, Congress and NASA, as well as stable and timely funding.
“For its part, NASA must determine the true long-term costs of its human exploration programs, establish realistic programs, define system requirements and mission planning, form or consolidate international partnerships, and exploit commercial space capabilities.”
NASA was initially looking to 2028 for its Artemis mission, however President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence had encouraged the agency to accelerate their efforts and target the mission four years earlier.
Some of the biggest concerns relate to the mission’s key technologies, such as the production and certification of the Space Launch System rocket and the completion of the Orion crew capsule.
Trump criticized NASA months later for aiming to bring astronauts back to the moon by 2024, saying the agency should instead focus on “ much larger ” initiatives like going to Mars, reducing its previous support for the initiative. lunar.
“For all the money we’re spending, NASA should NOT talk about going to the moon – we did it 50 years ago,” the president wrote on Twitter. ‘They should focus on the much bigger things we are doing, including Mars (of which the Moon is a part), Defense and Science
President-elect Joe Biden’s Democratic Party notes that it supports “NASA’s work to get Americans back to the moon and further to Mars, taking the next step in exploring our solar system,” but did not address the 2024 goal. .
NASA was initially looking to 2028 for its Artemis mission, however President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence had encouraged the agency to accelerate their efforts and steer the mission four years earlier.
Funding is a huge part of the Artemis mission, as NASA requested $ 1.4 billion from the US government to create the lunar lander that would take astronauts to the lunar surface.
However, the request was not fully granted – only $ 600 million was given.
In addition to the astronaut landings, NASA had plans to build a “Lunar Gateway” outpost that should have been orbiting the moon by now.
“We anticipate further scheduling delays and cost increases, making it unlikely that the Gateway will be available for the planned lunar landing in 2024,” NASA shared in the report.
.
[ad_2]
Source link