Japanese rating agency CERO has kept an eye on Ubisoft and asked to explain the inconsistency between the content of “Assassin’s Creed Viking Era” and the version submitted | 4Gamers

If you still have an impression, we reported it a few days ago“Assassin’s Creed: Viking Age” unlocked in Asia, accidentally blew up the battle between Ubisoft and CERO in Japan , And now CERO is staring at Ubisoft and today, in response to the difference between the trial and retail versions of Assassin’s Creed: Viking Era, Ubisoft is required to provide a formal explanation.

After Japan’s Ubisoft apologized, it immediately revealed the news that the Patch will be released in mid-December last week, which seems to have completely annoyed CERO. According to CERO’s previous classification standards, regardless of the game, even if you can see blood, images of bleeding amputated limbs and broken intestines are absolutely “NG” items and are not classified as level Z (only 18 years or older ) Everything is alright.

Additionally, some Japanese players have stated that it appears Ubisoft has quietly been selling the global version of “Assassin’s Creed: Viking Era” (ie the unmodified version) on its PC store since yesterday, but it needs to be purchased separately from the Japanese modified version. The original Japanese version cannot be overwritten.

CERO posted a new announcement on its official website today, stating that CERO has found that although “Assassin’s Creed Viking Era” is classified as Z in Japan, it has been confirmed that the version reviewed by Ubisoft is different from the version actually sold. Therefore, Ubiosft was formally contacted and asked for an explanation.

It is worth noting that the entire CERO ad is very strong in terms of vocabulary. The vernacular in Chinese is “You better go out and tell me clearly!”. Although CERO did not specify which object it was targeting, Ubisoft’s attempt to evade the review by using this method of getting on the bus before retrieving the ticket is highly questionable.

Of course, another interesting point is that in the last war, CERO completely ignored responsibility, saying Ubisoft hadn’t contacted them at all, but this time they took the initiative to accuse Ubisoft that the revised version is different from the version. sold, which obviously is counterproductive. . So it seems pretty obvious who the initiator of the Harmony version is.

However, when people are in charge of the leaderboard, they have the right to speak, I’m afraid Ubiosft’s games won’t do well in Japan in the future.