[ad_1]
Material photo by Hankyoreh
Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering canceled or amended more than 100,000 subcontracted parts manufacturing contracts for no other reason and was charged a 10 billion won penalty. The company was also investigated by the Public Prosecutor on charges of having violated for several years a subcontractor with a “dark contract” who did not adequately inform the details of the work as well as the specific price of the contract. On the 29th, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering, a major shipbuilding company, issued a penalty for illegal “post-construction contracts” for several years, arbitrarily canceling or modifying shipping services and down payments, to more than 100 subcontractors. He said he charged 100 million won. The company decided to ask the prosecution for an investigation. According to the results of the KFTC investigation, it emerged that Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering required subcontractors producing 194 marine pipeline supplies from 2015 to 2019 to produce parts for ships and offshore installations and arbitrarily canceled or amended the contract to no other reason. . 11,150 cases have been harmed by these subcontractors in the past four years. The subcontractors made the ordered product and if Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering canceled or modified the product order due to a design change or owner’s request, they had to bear the loss without hesitation. Earlier, Yoo Sung-kwon, head of the Fair Trade Commission’s Corporate Transaction Policy Bureau, said in a preliminary briefing on 27, “Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering only allows consent to cancel or change the production of parts in the ‘system of procurement collaboration ‘used with subcontractors, and has already made changes to manufacturing or product design. As a result, there was no consultation procedure for the loss that suppliers would suffer. “Subcontractors have a structure where subcontractors choose whether to agree without knowing why. “In addition, there were 10,6681 cases in which Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering routinely failed to issue contracts while delivering ship and offshore production work to 186 subcontractors of the company. , after starting the shipping business without a contract with Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering, only when the results of the work appeared, more than half of the contracts were issued reached 9,400 cases. Since subcontractors have no contracts, it is common for subcontractors to conduct their work without knowing the specific details of the job or the unit cost of the product. Upon receipt of the product on consignment, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering arbitrarily determined the subcontracting price that did not meet the cost of production using the “A” position, which would require modification or further construction. In this way, 91 subcontractors were damaged and 1471 cases were contracted. The Fair Trade Commission explained that Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering’s budget department reduced the subcontracting costs without a reasonable or objective basis and the payment was finally paid without consulting the subcontractor. This case was handled in accordance with the “ Efficient and Accelerated Case Management Measures for Multi-relationship Companies ” (implemented in 2018), which intensively handles the case when there are reports from different companies about the original company ‘GapJil’. This means that the poor quality of Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering has been achieved for a wide and wide range of subcontractors. Director Yuk said: “In the shipbuilding industry, there were prevailing unfair practices such as ‘post-construction contracts’, not issuing contracts in advance to subcontractors and lowering prices.” This is expected to be an opportunity to improve illegal business practices as a corrective action case. By Hong Seok-jae, staff reporter [email protected] ‘
.
[ad_2]
Source link
