[ad_1]
2018 will be remembered for many things, but Bitcoin will not be among them. Despite the best efforts of fortune tellers and tulip-farmers, those rosy forecasts were no match for ICO selling, regulation, security breaches, selloffs and delays.
In fact, the price predictions became even more unrealistic, as crypto values tumbled like a roly-poly panda bear in the snow.
Source: Facebook
Here are our favorite near and misses of the year:
Thomas Lee
Fundstrat Co-Founder Thomas Lee is perhaps the most widely cited crypto market strategist. Lee was bullish before bulls were cool, having left JPMorgan after correctly predicting the stock market bull run in 2009. His luck ran out this year, at least for crypto.
The bitcoin bears tried warning him, but he would not listen, that he was selling to the crypto sell-off in the first half of the year. He reminded the community that bitcoin's gains historically as from the top 10 trading days of the year, and therefore the No. 1 cryptocurrency had plenty of time to achieve a price of $ 25,000. Lee is a believer in price using the fair value and mining cost dynamic, no matter what the cost to his own track record.
It was more like $ 20,000, though Lee was still defiant against the critics. It was not until November that the target price of $ 15,000, which attained a return to 250% return. Once again, it became clear of this price.
Fundstrat's Lee has since revealed its days of predicting crypto prices are over, telling Bloomberg: "We are tired of people asking us about target prices."
Michael Novogratz
What a difference a year makes. Crypto's favorite Wall Street trader Michael Novogratz, who these days runs crypto merchant bank Galaxy Digital, could not have predicted this year's bear market, either. Last year he predicted that bitcoin was on its way to $ 40,000 in 2018. He is also infamous for calling a bitcoin bottom that never materialized, even as the crypto bears continued to taunt his predictions.
In September, he notoriously said, "I think we put in a low yesterday" using the hashtag #callingabottom. At that time, the BTC price was trading at $ 6,500. Novogratz eventually ceded to the bears, saying that the bitcoin price would probably not react $ 9,000 this year. Novogratz is reportedly looking to 2019 for bitcoin's new high.
Tim Draper *
We placed an asterisk by venture capitalist Tim Draper's name for his bitcoin price prediction is a bit more long-term. His outlook for a BTC price of $ 250,000 by 2022 still has time to come true, but 2018 did not do him any favors. The billionaire investor, however, does know how to put his money where he is $ 1.25 million into OpenNode, a bitcoin payment processor.
We'll keep an eye on this one, but the bitcoin price has to climb 6,500% higher over the next four years.
Ran NeuNer
In February 2018, Ran NeuNer, the host of CNBC's Crypto Trader, predicted that the bitcoin price would reach $ 50,000 at year-end 2018. He was confident in his prediction that he pinned the tweet. NeuNer had to eat his words and by November followed by another pinned tweet, this time stating: "Bitcoin will not finish 2018 at $ 50,000."
For the record, I am pinning this tweet. Bitcoin will not finish 2018 at $ 50 000.😂 https://t.co/CAZUABJ1Hk
– Ran NeuNer (@cryptomanran) November 1, 2018
At least he knows how to lose gracefully.
John McAfee
John McAfee predicted that Bitcoin would reach $ 1 million by year-end 2020. He may be compensating for a failed forecast in 2017 when he undershot the market, calling for BTC $ 5,000 by year-end 2017. McAfee is using a mining-fueled mathematical model to reach his forecast, or drugs. Basically whatever comes to hand, we suspect.
For some reason, we get compensated for something else.
if not, I will eat my dick on national television.
– John McAfee (@officialmcafee) July 17, 2017
BitMEX CEO Arthur Hayes, who reportedly warned the price could fall within the $ 2,000- $ 3,000 range. It's that bitcoin, and the correlated altcoins that trade with it, is unpredictable.
The author is invested in digital assets, including bitcoins, which is mentioned in this article.
[ad_2]Source link
