[ad_1]
The 51% attack on Ethereum Classic (ETC) meant that people on Twitter "were discussing" the concept of decentralization.
The recent 51% attack on the Ethereum Classic (ETC) network a few hours ago sparked a debate on the Twitter verse, particularly on the concept of decentralization.
A user with the name CryptoTesla has stated that if a network can not be 51% attached, it is not decentralized.
His statement was triggered by comments from other users on the announcement of Coinbase on the attack.
One of them, who seemed to be a tough supporter of the XRP, said, "Phew, I'm glad to be in XRP, did I mention that XRP is immune to double-shopping bouts?", Which was answered by a user named Kramer said: "All centralized databases are immune.The point is decentralized.Yes, shitcoin can be attacked at 51%."
This "conversation" was behind the aforementioned statement by CryptoTesla that managed to capture the attention of the founder of Litecoin, Charlie Lee, among his numerous comments on the recent accident of 51%.
Lee said that CryptoTesla's statement is stimulating.
He added that a decentralized cryptocurrency must be susceptible to 51% attack. However, instead of accepting CryptoTesla's statement, he went on to say "If a crypt can not be 51% attached, it is authorized and centralized".
This is a stimulating observation. 🤔
By definition, a decentralized cryptocurrency must be susceptible to 51% attacks if with hashrate, quota and / or other resources that can not be acquired without authorization.
If an encryption can not be 51% attached, it is authorized and centralized. https://t.co/LRCVj5F0O1
– Charlie Lee [LTC⚡] (@SatoshiLite) January 8, 2019
His comments have received various comments, many of which disapprove his opinion, although some agree, as the Giratina user believes it makes sense.
Follow Chepicap now chirping, YouTube, Telegram and Facebook!
[ad_2]Source link
