[ad_1]
Attention was drawn to the announcement by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of its interest in water security for Egypt and Sudan, after having supported, in words and deeds, the Egyptian initiative in Libya. A friend who appreciated his experience in public policy and his interest in Libyan and Arab public affairs commented on my article in the newspaper “Asharq Al-Awsat” on the Egyptian Initiative for Peace and Stability in Libya which could have been to be successful if the mediator or initiator were neutral like the Germans, for example, but Egypt is a party! I realized from his remark that he did not understand what I meant in the article. Any Arab can be neutral on an Arab question, such as Palestine, Libya, Syria or Yemen. What I meant is that Egypt has taken a stand to protect its national security and protect its Arab quarter, even as it is forced to use forced diplomacy alongside the power of diplomacy. Iranians are always ready to use force through their loyal militias and the “Revolutionary Guard”, for those they consider the strategic interests of their country and their allies in various Arab countries. And the Turks are ready to use military force, militias and mercenaries to preserve or invent short and long term strategic interests. For years we have been witnessing international and regional demonstrations of denial and condemnation of Turkish and Iranian interventions in Arab countries, without this being discouraged by the two countries or preventing their interventions and their contribution to the continuing disorder and sabotage of known and unknown interests! Of course, the goal of any Arab effort is to restore peace and stability to Arab countries in difficulty. However, with the exception of Yemen and Libya, where forced diplomacy is used; The purely diplomatic intervention did not help, on the contrary, this “neutrality”, even if accompanied by international decisions, remained devoid of tangible effects in the service of stability and peace.
In the spring of 2013, I was in the company of President Fouad Siniora when he met the late Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Saud Al-Faisal. President Siniora was concerned about the stormy developments in Syria and I was amazed by the Egyptian developments, where “political Islam” took power democratically (!) And Prince Saud said, as far as I remember; There is no fear for Egypt, nor for Tunisia and Algeria, because the national army is one and capable, and the deep state of the three countries is in it and with it. Rather, the fear is for Syria, as the army disintegrates and turns into a sectarian militia, asking other sectarian militias to support it, and the revolutionaries also dismantle their weapons and become militias. As long as Iran intervenes, Turkey will, and the Americans and Russians will also be close. For more than two years, Arab diplomacy has worked unsuccessfully, because we have had nothing but mediation pressures and international decisions. If it were possible, or on the horizon, that Arab intervention was possible to restore stability, the Iranians and others would not have dared! And what happened in Syria, the same happened in several Arab countries, and the rope is on the tractor. Negotiation diplomacy without the other skills on the table requires aspirants from near and far, and there is no strength or power but in God.
The “wise men” will say, and they have said so, but the intervention in Yemen against the coup has so far failed to bring the country back in favor of legitimacy. Those who know Yemen also know that if the Yemeni countries are left to the Houthi dynasty, it means endless wars, at least 3 entities, the survival of “Al Qaeda” there, border disputes between entities on the mountains and on the coasts, the loss of security of the Arabian and Red Seas and permanent dangers for countries. The Gulf, where are the dangers of the Oman and Gulf Liberation Front in the 1970s, during the Cold War ?!
The Kingdom and the UAE have taken the lead for the sake of Yemen’s security, peace and unity and for the sake of the security of the Gulf and its states.
Today’s Egyptian initiative for Libya, which has been supported by most Arab countries and most of the international community, strengthens and opens the horizons of peace and hope, and helps a return to the Berlin Conference and a negotiated solution. peaceful. It is the alternative to the militias and the Turkish invasion and its mercenaries. If it weren’t for the Egyptian hold on the table, the division would have increased in the near future and conflict and wars would continue.
Since the last meeting of the Arab League, we have seen a return to Arab solidarity, common defense and common Arab action. This is something that has been absent from the Sirte summit in Libya in 2010. Usually, in times of crisis, a solid Arab melting pot appears that seeks to recover, restore rationality, solidarity and safeguard interests. Amid the multiplication of inherited and current problems with the ocean and inland are the Kingdom, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Jordan to the east and the Gulf. Therefore, the relentless work to rebuild the Arab system that has been cracked, not because of the Arab controversies as they say, but because of the Iranian and Turkish interventions and the work of international politics with them in the absence of the Arab people of home!
There is still nowhere in the contemporary world where these two dangerous diseases meet in the countries of Arab turmoil; External interventions and armed militias that have started working for them. In this “solid circle”, the Arab countries have excellent relations with the international system and with the major powers. Real-time and mobile diplomacy should have the capabilities to allow for the gradual curbing of interference, in agreement with the international community. As for the militias, they have only national armies, which must be supported without hesitation in order to regain national strength and capability. And let’s stop listening to analyzes on the strengths of political Islam. Islam has no problems, because a global religion like Islam cannot be transformed into an ideology of militias who carry counterfeit flags and use them to terrorize people, plunder wealth and work for those who pay the most. It is an opportunity after the absence of all opportunities, an opportunity for the security of countries, the peace of humanity and the safeguarding of the interests of societies, so it is possible in a large and rich Arab country like Iraq that would the government not be able to pay the salaries of its employees and for an armed militia to show its forces on the street without accountability or supervision? And in an Arab country like Lebanon, prosperous and cutting edge more than a century ago, is it conceivable that its people will fail and starve, because the armed militia and its allies want it? And what is said of Lebanon and Iraq, the same and more is said of Arab Libya.
There is no way out except through Arab solidarity and Arab initiative for the good of humanity and urbanization.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
