[ad_1]
In an interview with journalist Alaa Thabet, editor-in-chief of the Al-Ahram newspaper, which will be published in its weekly issue tomorrow, Friday, Abu Al-Gheit said that regional powers seeking to dominate the region’s capabilities are using the more effective and less expensive method, fragmenting societies from within, which is a very old strategy, followed by all colonial powers, which indicates that any colonial project will not be successful without a strategy of dismantling national forces.
Aboul Gheit warned that the Iranian and Turkish projects, the main goal of which is the elimination of the Arab nation state, so that the Arab world is divided into sectarian provinces, each of which is controlled by an armed militia, indicating that each erosion of the nation state is an opponent of sovereignty and independence, and it is What it has become with it, the living forces in the Arab world, must resist this looming danger.
In response to a question about the “port of Beirut” explosion a few days ago, and the secretary general of the Arab League went to the affected capital to find out the nature of the incident, Aboul Gheit said: “I went to Beirut immediately after the disaster, and what I saw on the ground is beyond simple A big explosion, as the city seems to be coming out of a war, and what happened was a real national disaster, it touched open wounds to the Lebanese, and will have great repercussions, not only on the level of economic losses, but also on the political situation and social stability “, noting that Lebanon is not far from the crises, but was already suffering from a serious and unprecedented economic crisis, and a political crisis that has been going on since at least October 2019, and the port explosion adds a new dimension to these crises, aggravates them and reveals the impossibility of continuing the same approach in managing issues.
He added: “It is a pity that you see Beirut in this situation, as it is a city that loves life and beauty, and has a place in the heart of every Arab, and I told the Lebanese during my meetings with them out of sympathy and solidarity, that the disaster has revealed the extent of love for Lebanon in our hearts and that the feeling of solidarity is real and sincere “. From everyone, and I saw the volume of aid that flowed immediately and spontaneously from all Arab countries into Beirut, so that Lebanese officials made it clear to me in their conversations that urgent medical and food assistance may have met the need in this moment and that the next priority is to rebuild AND build buildings that have been destroyed and damaged, so that families who have left their homes can return “, noting that about 300,000 Lebanese have left their homes due to the disaster, and the priority is that they return to resume their normal life.
Aboul Gheit went on to say: “During my visit I told the Lebanese that the Arab League is under their command and that we will do everything in our power, within the framework of the capabilities at our disposal, to help them in this test.” indicating that the Arab League is not a country that can send shipments of aid. But it has great potential to mobilize and motivate all efforts in the Arab world, as well as in the outside world and in relief organizations.
He stressed that, on the occurrence of the disaster, and in coordination with the Lebanese authorities, he worked to include a permanent item on the agenda of the Economic and Social Council of the Arab League, relating to support for Lebanon, and the presence of this point will have a major impact in addressing the spillover effects of the destruction that has occurred, and not just in urgent relief matters. He said the Arab League has great capabilities in the joint Arab action system and specialized organizations that can be mobilized to address the effects of the disaster in Lebanon.
Aboul Gheit explained that on his return from Lebanon, he addressed a letter to Arab foreign ministers, bringing his assessment of what he saw during his field visit to Beirut, his meetings with all components of the Lebanese spectrum and what it sees as the urgent needs at this stage to help the Lebanese overcome the effects of the disaster. The issue must not stop at the end of urgent relief, but rather it must extend to the issues related to participation in the reconstruction of houses and buildings and the restoration of what has been damaged, and this is also an urgent need at this time, in light of the strong shortage of building materials.
Aboul Gheit stressed that the Palestinian question will remain the central question of the Arabs, expressing his hope that the new American administration, which will come out of the elections next November, will realize the inadmissibility of its proposed solution, called the “American peace agreement” , and which will initiate In relaunching a new project for real peace, based on direct negotiations between the two parties, based on the creation of a Palestinian state on the borders of June 4, 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital, stressing that this is the only feasible project.
He said, of course, there is some relief that the Israeli annexation plan stalled and did not pass, and the extent of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s global rejection of this recklessness has emerged to get out of the way. its political crisis, threatening to set the entire region on fire, and the truth is that the annexation of any percentage of the land occupied in the West Bank simply means that the logic of the agreement itself is no longer valid “, indicating that the Arab countries and the Lega have played an important role in firmly defending themselves against this plan and warning of the consequences of moving forward with it.
He went on to say, “My assessment is that the US administration could better realize the unacceptability of its settlement project, called the” American peace plan “, because what happened is that Israel turned this project into a plan for annexing and annexing Palestinian lands and nothing else, and of course, everyone is waiting for what will happen in the US elections next November, and I hope – regardless of the identity of the new administration – that there is a revival of a real project of peace, adopted by the United States and other powers of the international quartet, based on direct negotiation between the two parties, based on the creation of a Palestinian state on the borders of June 4, 1967. And with East Jerusalem as its capital, this is the only feasible project “.
In response to a question about the role of the Arab League in addressing Turkish aggression against Libya, and how the League views Turkish attempts to exist on Libyan lands, and its agreement with the Sarraj government regarding maritime borders, Aboul Gheit said: “The situation in Libya has become very complex, with all its military, security, political and economic dimensions. The overlaps and differences between the Libyan parties are profound, as each of these parties has its own vision of ways out of the current crisis, in addition to the fact that the conflict itself has become more dangerous due to the multiplicity and abundance of foreign military interventions and the systematic violations of the arms embargo imposed on the country and the recruitment of mercenaries and fighters foreigners. Battlefields. “
He stressed that the Arab League’s position is clear and explicit on ways to resolve the Libyan crisis, which must take place through a peaceful and inclusive political path, led and owned by Libya and under the auspices of the United Nations, as there is no solution. military to the Libyan situation and neither side can get victory over the other. Or to extend its control by force over the entire Libyan soil.
He stressed that this agreement cannot happen in light of these external interventions and the regional targeting of the country’s security and stability, as all these interventions and actions in various forms are rejected and condemned by the Arab League, and we cannot accept them, and it is also the position of the international community expressed by the Security Council, the states and organizations participating in the Berlin process agreed unanimously.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
