[ad_1]
Seen hundreds of thousands of times and broadcast massively on social networks since Wednesday, a documentary called “Hold-Up” uncovers a conspiratorial argument filled with at least thirty false claims, according to the verification work of the Effective AFP team.
Here are the main vehicles in audiovisual production:
Useless “germinal” masks
The speakers rely in particular on comments from the government which, at first, felt that it was not necessary for the general public to wear them, before changing their doctrine.
According to Astrid Stuckelberger, introduced as a doctor of medicine, “the WHO does not say that everyone should wear a mask”. It’s wrong. The World Health Organization supports the use of masks for the general public in a note published in June.
Dermatologist Claude Veres says surgical masks “aren’t very protective” and that cotton masks become “nests of microbes in hours”, two theories already contradicted by AFP experts.
Surgical masks help limit the spread of the virus, especially by protecting others from our own postillions, according to several experts interviewed since March. Many other specialists have ensured that the so-called “general public” masks are not dangerous to health if worn correctly.
Sweden was spared without imprisonment
The authors of this audiovisual production compare the daily death peaks between France and Sweden, which has pursued a less rigid strategy than most European countries in the face of the coronavirus. As evidence, according to the authors, of the ineffectiveness of the containment, Sweden recorded 115 deaths a day at the height of the crisis in mid-April compared to 1,483 in France.
But when we relate these figures to the populations of the two countries, we see that the death rates are quite close, despite a lower population density in Sweden, according to data collected by AFP.
Portugal, which has a population comparable to that of Sweden and which put in place a strict containment in the spring, has a death rate double that of Sweden.
Hydroxychloroquine, Lancet and Rivotril
Many interested parties claim that hydroxychloroquine is a treatment against Covid, claiming this drug promoted by Didier Raoult has proven its effectiveness.
It’s wrong. Since the outbreak began, Professor Raoult has actually made several studies public, but they have been widely criticized due to their significant methodological problems.
Since then, other studies – such as the large British Recovery study, France’s Hycovid, or Solidarity, conducted worldwide by the WHO – have come to the conclusion that hydroxychloroquine is not effective against Covid-19.
Showing a graph of the preliminary results of the French Discovery test, the “Hold-up” narrator says that this test was canceled “to block hydroxychloroquine, which showed the best intermediate results”.
This intox had already been verified by AFP. Early results actually showed “no effect” of hydroxychloroquine treatment on disease, according to epidemiologist Dominique Costagliola, a member of Discovery’s decision-making committee.
At the end of May, the medical journal The Lancet published a study concluding the ineffectiveness and even the dangers of hydroxychloroquine treatment. Extremely rare, this study was withdrawn by some of its authors the following week due to concerns about the reliability and origin of the medical data of the patients used in the study.
In “Hold-up”, Professor Christian Perronne states that in “Switzerland, Asia and America” ”there was a spike in mortality” for 2-3 weeks “under” the Lancet effect, when people stopped to prescribe “.
These comments are unfounded. Official mortality data for the countries and regions concerned, compiled daily by the AFP, do not show a trend peak in mortality in this period.
Shortly thereafter, pharmacist Serge Rader says elderly patients with Covid-19 are given a “Rivotril syringe to completely run out of them while they were in respiratory distress.”
This interpretation is wrong. Rivotril is not used to “ending” the sick or “euthanizing” them, as already mentioned in the poisonings denied by the AFP in April.
A global conspiracy
Former pharmacist Jean-Bernard Fourtillan assures in “Hold-Up” that a patent had already been filed on “tests to detect the disease Covid-19, 13 October 2015”, a claim already invalidated by AFP.
As indicated on the website of the European Patent Office, this patent was updated in 2020 by its inventor to adapt the initially patented technology (biometric data analysis techniques) to the detection of the new coronavirus.
Mr. Fourtillan then claims that the virus “was produced by the Pasteur Institute”, false information verified by the AFP on several occasions and denied by the Institute.
This infox is based on a patent filed by the Institute in 2004, which refers to the genetic code of a virus that is cousin but different from SARS-CoV-2. In early November, the justice system convicted an internet user who had spread similar false information for “defamation”.
Find the full list of AFP verification articles on Covid-19 on the AFP FACTUEL blog: https://factuel.afp.com/le-coronavirus-les-verifications-faites-par-lafp
- AFP factual blog
.
[ad_2]
Source link
