That’s why “The Crown” is great, but dangerous: TV



[ad_1]

Trump can no longer tweet anything without it appearing with a warning (“Controversial Truth Content”). Can Netflix do it too, please?

I worked my way through The Crown until the end of the fourth season. My verdict: the series is fantastic. It’s dangerous.

I’m obviously biased: I’ve met not only Peter Morgan, the creator of The Crown, but most of the characters in his series, including, strangely enough, Margaret Thatcher.


Gillian Anderson (52) plays Margaret Thatcher in

Gillian Anderson (52) plays Margaret Thatcher in “The Crown” as someone who teaches and despises the Queen …Photo: Des Willie / Netflix

What Makes Viewing “Crown” a Pain: Most of the characters are crooked. The queen is always worried, Prince Charles a towel, Diana a stupid naive … – caricatures hit badly.

Then there are the historical errors. There are several books that address the historical shortcomings of “The Crown” (including two very good ones by historian Hugo Vickers). I’m not as bothered by inaccuracies as by the grotesque to the mischievous twist of history.

For example, the queen did not like Mrs. Thatcher. Right. Morgan spins the fantasy of being humiliated by the reunited royal family on her first visit to Balmoral. Absurd!


... in truth, the relationship between the Iron Lady and the Queen was complicated, but characterized by a high level of mutual respect

… in truth, the relationship between the Iron Lady and the Queen was complicated, but characterized by a high level of mutual respectPhoto: Popperfoto via Getty Images

Tasteless: the depiction of the assassination attempt on Charles’s adoptive father, Lord Mountbatten, in 1979. The scenes are accompanied by the intercutations of royalty killing animals on the hunt – it should probably get stuck: royals cruel, your fault. Incidentally, the IRA not only killed Charles’s uncle in the attack, but also his nephew Nicholas († 14), the mother of his son-in-law, Lady Brabourne († 83), and a crew member …

The bad thing about shows like “The Crown” is that they cause damage because they’re so well done.

It is difficult to defend ourselves from the fact that the images that are told to you, including the nonsense that are widespread, settle in our heads.

After all, this particularly bad season offers a glimmer of hope: it triggers a debate. A funny contribution by Maureen Dowd was published yesterday in the “New York Times”. The columnist compares Diana to Trump: just as the somewhat narcissistic Diana lashed out at the end and nearly destroyed the monarchy, now Trump is acting too, that he is trying again, out of the White House, to overthrow democracy.


1981 Charles and Diana's Engagement in Real Life ...

1981 Charles and Diana’s Engagement in Real Life …Photo: Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images


... and those of series producers.  Well done!  At least on the outside

… and those of series producers. Well done! At least on the outsidePhoto: Des Willie / Netflix

And it reveals how Diana felt about Trump. Dowd was at the legendary White House party in 1985 (the one where Diana danced with John Travolta!).

“This makes me feel cold,” Diana is said to have said of The Don. She should! Presumably. It seems plausible.

.

[ad_2]
Source link