Ripple’s Ethereum, Litecoin and XRP

[ad_2][ad_1]

For the day ahead

Litecoin is expected to break out of the $ 58.24 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $ 59.36.

However, support from the broader market would be needed for Litecoin to return to $ 59 levels.

Barring an extended cryptocurrency rally, the first major resistance and resistance level at $ 60 would likely limit any upside.

In the event of a sustained breakout, Litecoin would likely test resistance at $ 61 before any pullback. The second major resistance level is found at $ 60.75.

Failure to break out of the $ 58.24 rotation level would bring the first major support level at $ 56.85 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off later in the day, however, Litecoin is expected to avoid the 23.6% FIB of $ 54.00. The second major support level at $ 55.73 should limit any downside.

Looking at the technical indicators

First major support level: $ 56.85

Pivot Level: $ 58.24

First major resistance level: $ 59.36

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $ 45.30

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $ 71

62% FIB Retracement Level: $ 100

Ripple’s XRP

Ripple’s XRP was up 1.41% on Tuesday. Reversing a 1.23% decline from Monday, Ripple’s XRP ended the day at $ 0.25409.

A mixed start to the day saw Ripple’s XRP drop to a morning intraday low $ 0.24823 before making a move.

Avoiding the first major support level at $ 0.2456, Ripple’s XRP rose to a late morning intraday high $ 0.26462.

Ripple’s XRP broke through the first major resistance level at $ 0.2558 and the second major resistance level at $ 0.2610.

A late morning reversal, however, saw Ripple’s XRP return to $ 0.256 levels in the afternoon.

In the 2nd Mid-day, Ripple’s XRP broke through the first major resistance level before ending the day at $ 0.254.

At the time of writing, Ripple’s XRP was down 0.37% to $ 0.25314. A mixed start to the day saw Ripple’s XRP rise to a morning high of $ 0.25451 before falling to a low of $ 0.25274.

Ripple’s XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

[ad_2]Source link