[ad_1]
The Supreme Administrative Court stated that Article (1) of Law No. 453 of 1954 concerning industrial and commercial establishments and other problematic establishments, harmful to health and dangerous – modified by law no. 359 of 1956 establishes that “the provisions of this law apply to the deposits stipulated in the table attached to this document. Law”.
Read also | Under the law … Find out the penalty for “forgetting” about work
Article (2) of the same law states that “It is not permissible to establish or operate any place subject to the provisions of this law without a license to do so, and any place established or operated without a license must be administratively closed or controlled if closure is impossible “.
Article (12) of the same law states that “In the event of an imminent danger to public health or public safety as a result of the operation of one of the shops to which the provisions of this law apply, the director general of the Department of Licensing may, upon proposal of the administrative branch in whose jurisdiction the location is located, issue a reasoned decision to discontinue operation of the store in whole or in part, and such decision will be enforceable through the administrative method.
Article (14) of the same law, replaced by law no. 359 of 1956, states that “in the event of the death of the licensee, whoever has transferred ownership of the shop must inform the competent authority within two weeks from the date of death of their name and the name of their representatives, and this representative will be responsible for implementation of the provisions of this law. And the decisions that implement it, and they must take the necessary steps to transfer the license to them within four months from the date of death.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
