[ad_1]
Jessica Ciencin Henriquez slams ex Josh Lucas in tweets since deleted for bringing their son, eight, around his ‘masked friends’ for Thanksgiving
Jessica Ciencin Henriquez slammed her ex-husband Josh Lucas on Twitter after taking her son “to a house party” during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
In a string of deleted tweets since then, the 35-year-old writer revealed that she celebrated “solo Thanksgiving” from the safety of her own home as Lucas allegedly took their eight-year-old son to dinner with his “new friends without a mask”. . on Thursday.
“He’s everything that’s currently wrong in the world – assholes who think the rules don’t apply to them,” he fired in a since-canceled Twitter tirade.
Angry: Jessica Ciencin Henriquez slammed her ex-husband Josh Lucas on Twitter, after taking her son “to a house party” amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; seen in 2017
He added: ‘For all the people who have lost a loved one this year or have fought against Covid, remember that is all [because] of people like @joshlucas who will do whatever they want, regardless of the impact it has on anyone else, not even their own child. ”
In conclusion, the mother of one wished a “Happy Thanksgiving to all who weren’t a selfish idiot,” before engaging with a supportive Twitter follower.
When a follower sympathized with her co-parenting challenges amid rising coronavirus cases across the country, Henriquez replied, “I feel more sorry for our son whose only example of a man is selfish.”
Pulled on Twitter: In a string of deleted tweets since then, the 35-year-old writer revealed that she celebrated “ Solo Thanksgiving ” from the safety of her own home as Lucas allegedly took their eight-year-old son to dinner “ new, Thursday friends without a mask
“ He’s all that’s currently wrong in the world – assholes who think the rules don’t apply to them, ” she wrote in a since-deleted Twitter tirade (seen in 2017).
It is not the first time he has publicly condemned the choices of the Sweet Home Alabama star, who recently accused him of cheating on her.
“Exes are exes for a reason,” she tweeted in May. ‘Having a child with someone makes you want to forgive him more than you normally would, it makes you believe he is better than he is.
‘But it really takes a fucking human to cheat on your partner (fix: now ex partner) in the middle of a pandemic. Thanks for reminding me why I left you in the first place. ‘
Shots fired: When a follower sympathized with her co-parenting challenges amid rising coronavirus cases across the country, Henriquez replied, “I’m more sorry for our son whose only example of a man is selfish” ( pictured in August 2017)
He continued: ‘I deserve better. Our son deserves better. And yes, I air it publicly because there are many women who accept a lot less than they deserve because there are children in the photo. You are not stupid to hope, to believe that people can change. I see you.’
Henriquez and Lucas married in March 2012 and are co-parent of their seven-year-old son Noah.
The couple reportedly reconciled during the quarantine, after being back again after their divorce in 2014.
Cheater Exposed: In May, the Colombian-American writer attached a screenshot of Notes, which read, “But it takes a real human to cheat on your partner (fix: now ex-partner) in the midst of a pandemic.”
A source told People: ‘They haven’t been together for a long time. They are co-parents and have done so since their breakup in 2014. They are now in California but live separately. They weren’t trying to reconcile.
They practice ‘bird’s nest’ co-parenting, which means they leave the same house while their child stays there, and they even moved to Bali last fall so they can attend an environmentally focused school .
But it wasn’t all a peaceful coexistence between exes, as in the past it has opened up to the struggles of co-parenting.
Henriquez wrote for Time in 2018: “ We really tried to be the friendliest exes in the world and in the photos it was believable, but in reality we were two people desperately clinging to the fantasy of what we thought our family might be. ”
.
[ad_2]
Source link