[ad_1]
The performance of the Apple A12Z in Cinebench R23 has been leaked. This is a great way to reflect on how far the business can go in terms of performance their new ARM-based Apple Silicon, which will improve the new Macbook.
Apple Silicon promises, based on Cinebench results of the A12Z Bionic (and Apple M1!)
The A12Z is the SoC used in Developer transition kit, the equipment Apple provides to developers for testing Apple Silicon, which leaves Intel x86 CPUs behind in Macs, and adapt your applications. Well, let’s show you the performance data in Cinebench R23, the new version of the popular benchmark that comes with support for Apple’s ARM-based processors.
Cinebench has always been a good point of reference with this type of comparison, hence the data that interest us a lot:
| Cinebench R23 Multi | Cinebench R23 Mono | Nuclei | |
| Apple A12Z | 4530 | 990 | 4 performances + 4 efficiency |
| Apple M1 (update) | 7508 | 1498 | 4 performances + 4 efficiency |
| AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (Xiaomi RedmiBook 16 R5) | 5920 | 1152 | 6/6 |
| Intel Core i5-8250U (Honor Magicbook) | 3194 | 840 | 4/8 |
| Intel Core i9-9980H (Macbook Pro 16 2019) | 8752 | 1140 | 8/16 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (desktop) | 8891 | 939 | 8/16 |
| Intel Core i7 8086K (Escritorio) | 8686 | 1260 | 6/12 |
Source of information of other CPUs: Notebookcheck
The data shows how single-core performance is superior to the i5-8250U and almost close a los Ryzen 5 4500U and i9-9980H, which have much more frequency than this A12Z. In terms of multicore, it falls far short of the 4500U’s 6 cores and 6 threads, since the A12Z has 4 cores focused on performance and another 4 at lower consumption, which have worse performance.
It is essential that you keep this in mind many media have published that these are the results of the Apple M1, what will be the SoC that will power the first Macbook with ARM, and it should be a little better than the A12Z. This is a confusion that basically has spread too much, and we understand the error of these media because it is what practically everyone has published.
But the correct information is that we are dealing with an A12Z, and if we trace it we find references from several days ago that confirm this:
Also, note that the M1 runs (apparently) at 3.2GHz of boost, a big difference from the 2.49 GHz of the A12Z.
Update: Apple M1 data
We update the news to show you the data of the Apple M1!
Particularly surprising super single core performance, which at 3.1 GHz is close to an Intel Core i7-1165G7 (Tiger Lake). Keep in mind that that generation of Intel has excellent IPC and the turbo of that particular CPU is up to 4.7 GHz. So this reinforces the idea that Apple Silicon’s capabilities are amazing.
The multi-core performance gives a result of 7508, expected with its 4 + 4 layout.
Apple Silicon is certainly promising
Given these results, it is difficult not to state this these Apple Silicon chips for Mac are very promising. The ARM architecture allows to reach extraordinary levels of energy efficiency, and the low frequencies achieved are compensated by an excellent CPI.
In this sense, the biggest challenge may be give an emulation of the x86 apps to match. To run any application that isn’t Arm ready, new Macs will need to make use of it Rosette 2, which translates the code at the time of installationand whether there will be a major impact on performance remains to be seen. It is something that Windows has not achieved, but things look good for Apple. We will know more in the coming weeks.
We advise you to read the best processors on the market.
Perhaps Apple marks the beginning of a journey where Arm begins to really compete with x86 on PC, beyond the new Macs. Do you think this will happen? Will x86 emulation advance with Windows? Are Apple Silicons Really Promising? We invite you to comment in the comments.
Source link
