[ad_1]
According to Robert Hallock, AMD’s technical director of marketing, it is completely normal that the mid-range Ryzen 5000 (Ryzen 5600X) reaches temperatures of up to 95 degrees when working at full load and that the mid-range (Ryzen 7 5800X) and high-end (Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X) models achieve 90 degrees. It ensures that we have nothing to worry about given those temperatures they do not affect the life of the processors.
I know this may sound a little odd, especially since it’s way below that ideal concept of temperatures that many users have set around 70 degrees when it comes to desktop processors. We have to keep this in mind in reality there is no single ideal of temperatures in this senseBecause each architecture and each CPU has a specific design and is made to work with specific thermal values.
For example, a low-power processor is designed to run at lower frequencies and to maintain lower temperatures, while high-performance processors they focus on just the opposite. In this sense, Hallock commented that we need to change our way of thinking and that we need to know distinguish between what is wrong and what is not “desirable”. This high temperature range allows, according to the AMD executive, for Ryzen 5000 processors to have more headroom when it comes to adjusting and maintaining their maximum frequencies for longer.
On the other hand, we must also keep in mind that we are talking a scenario involving a full loadIn other words, these temperatures “are normal” when the processor is working with all its cores at 100%. This is a very important detail that we are not always aware of. Seeing a Ryzen 9 5950X spinning at 70 degrees while moving a game is of no real value, as said game will only use 6 of its 16 cores. Hallock talks about a scenario where that chip has all 16 cores running under full load.
Ryzen 5000 and maximum working temperatures: are they really normal values?
Personally I believe that the explanation given by Robert Hallock was a bit unfortunate. The nuance it introduces when it comes to full workloads, i.e. high temperatures when the Ryzen 5000 is working at full load, is correct, since it’s not the same as having a CPU loaded at 30% with a game than at 100% with a synthetic test.
However, I believe it generated unnecessary inconvenience due to its concise explanation. The first thing to keep in mind is that the temperatures you provided are the maximum values of each processor, that is the level above which severe thermal throttling would occur, and which, of course, nobody wants to have to reach. It is true that the CPU dynamically adjusts the frequencies, increasing them when temperatures and power allow, but also reducing them when we reach those “unwanted” temperatures.
Regarding the topic of the useful life of processors operating at such high temperatures, it is true that, provided they are not accompanied by high voltages, its actual impact on the processor lifecycle shouldn’t matter, but what about those who decide to overclock, crank up voltages and think 90-degree temperatures are normal? So what they could get into big trouble.
I can perfectly understand that a high performance Ryzen 5000 with 12 cores and 24 threads or more records high temperatures when all of its cores are running under full load, in fact Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 5950X are around between 80 and 90 degrees with overclocking when working under full load (accompanied by 280mm AIO liquid cooling), but that doesn’t mean we should normalize temperatures to 90 or 95 degrees this way. Yes, both are within the thermal specifications of each chip, but they mark a limit that we don’t want (and shouldn’t) reach.
Source link
