Cryptocurrency has its biggest problem ever: EOS is a blockchain or a cloud service?


Crypto projects based on smart contracts are currently being defined

Many cryptocurrencies have flourished according to their respective use cases, but some cryptocurrency projects have chosen similar use cases, but with a slight difference one with the other. Therefore, it has become very difficult for investors and for the usual community members to choose one of them for all Crypto operations. When it comes to decentralized applications and smart contracts, Ethereum, EOS and Tron are the three names that invariably cross our minds. Many of them assume that all three projects are based on the development of Smart Contracts and decentralized applications, but among them there is a fine line.

Ethereum is like a parent of Tron and EOS

The precise difference between EOS and Ethereum is that the former is well known for its implementation of the protocol in its own way, and is considered more efficient than the Ethereum. However, Tron's blockchain does not seem to focus on overcome EOS or Ethereum but it has its own set of use cases that the blockchain project has been working on since its inception. The main objective of the Tron Blockchain is very different. Interestingly, shortly after the announcement of EOS and Tron, their tokens were powered by ERC20, but none of them were satisfied with the blockchain protocol and soon launched its mainnet.

Differences in the consent mechanism

The Tron Blockchain eagerly awaits a futuristic web interface incorporating blockchain technology, while EOS, on the other hand, does not see the time to exchange any resource with an intrinsic value in an easy and efficient way. The Ethereum Blockchain is committed to the democratization of Smart Contract and decentralized applications. However, technically the consent algorithm of the EOS block block platform revolves around 21 dedicated delegates who take part in the confirmation of the blocks and when it comes to Ethereum, it is much more decentralized than EOS. Finally, one of the largest so-called operating system or the Tron blockchain platform, incorporates a mechanism in which 21 supernodes manage the entire ecosystem, which are indirectly elected by TRX token holders.

Programming languages ​​needed for the development of smart contracts

Regarding development prospects, the EOS block block platform requires C ++, as a programming language to allow developers to develop smart contracts on this particular blockchain platform. Similarly, when we consider Ethereum, the blockchain platform requires the use of a more recent, more recent programming language called Solidity. The Tron blockchain platform is mainly developed using the Java programming language.

Following are some code snippets from the GitHub repository of their respective blockchain platforms.

1. Ethereum

func CompileSolidityString (solc, source string) (map[string]* Contract, error) {
if len (source) == 0 {
return nil, errors.New ("solc: empty source string")
s, err: = SolidityVersion (solc)
if you miss! = nil {
return nil, err
args: = append (s.makeArgs (), "-")
cmd: = exec.Command (s.Path, append (args, "-") …)
cmd.Stdin = strings.NewReader (source)
return (cmd, source)

2. EOS

int main (int argc, char ** argv) {
setlocale (LC_ALL, "");
bindtextdomain (locale_domain, locale_path);
textdomain (local_domain);
context = eosio :: client :: http :: create_http_context ();
wallet_url = default_wallet_url;


public SolidityNode (Manager dbManager, Args cfgArgs) {
this.dbManager = dbManager;
this.cfgArgs = cfgArgs;
lastSolidityBlockNum = dbManager.getDynamicPropertiesStore (). getLatestSolidifiedBlockNum ();
ID.set (lastSolidityBlockNum);
databaseGrpcClient = new DatabaseGrpcClient (cfgArgs.getTrustNodeAddr ());
remoteLastSolidityBlockNum = getLastSolidityBlockNum ();

The pros and cons of using C ++ compared to other programming languages

The programming languages of the respective blockchain projects can be recognized by the fragments mentioned above. when it comes to development and perspective, Solidity is a simpler programming language than C ++ or Java. It must be understood by developers that C ++ enables developers with much lower level (hardware) privileges that may not be possible in the case of Solidity. It effectively monitors or gives access to the garbage collector, which is not the case with Solidity. Effective memory management is one of the key features that a developer must keep in mind, before developing smart contracts on one of the blockchain platforms mentioned above.


According to cryptocurrency experts, it has also been estimated that currently applied programming language technologies and paradigms could become obsolete within 6 months or even a year, as blockchain progress takes place at a very rapid pace. Therefore, developers must always be ready to keep up with the development of the smart contract.

[ad_2]Source link