[ad_1]
The national team must demonstrate against Ecuador, in Quito, that the defeat against Uruguay is behind them and that they can join as guests.
On one side Gustavo Alfaro and his concern for COVID-19 after the positive aspects of Énner Valencia, Alan Franco and Diego Palacios, in principle, and subsequently with the negative results of Moisés Corozo, José Cifuentes and Mario Pineida.
So even though the Argentine said he had no intention of summoning men from the local tournament, the virus forced him to call Jordi Alcívar, José Cevallos and Jacob Murillo to get the payroll needed for today’s duel between Ecuador and Colombia. in Quito.
Yes, Alfaro spoke of defensive inattention, but the important thing in the last few hours has been the health of the group, taking care of oneself and being strict with the protocols to prevent the epidemic from escalating.
On the other hand, Carlos Queiroz who did not want to refer fully to his mistakes, but to the referee’s mistakes in a sort of distraction that is usually worth as much as having the frankness to recognize how badly Colombia have acted against Uruguay. “He didn’t call a penalty in favor and another that wasn’t so clear. That’s what makes me angry.”
Alfaro is calmer for the support that the positive results give him, even if the other positives make him restless and on the move, while Queiroz is going through a small crisis with a team that does not seem retentive compared to what he wants on the pitch. or at least what he imagines on his table.
Although there is no evidence of an incessant state of alarm, in the national team there is caution and prudence to avoid a bigger disaster, and that at the end of this double appointment it can be said that three points have been obtained and play a role in the imaginary and in the calculations that Uruguay was won and lost to Ecuador, even if the reality is the opposite.
It might interest you: this is what Dávinson Sánchez said of the defeat against Uruguay
To have a point of reference, and perhaps a comparison, it is good to remember that in the first three days of the journey towards the World Cup in Brazil, Colombia had four units (in two games, because they stopped at the opening date), and for the Russia, at the same height, the score was the same.
The funny thing is that in the fourth round of both qualifiers (2014 and 2018) he lost to Argentina in Barranquilla so the national team could not add, but later on, tickets for the world championships were obtained. And if we don’t go to the last visits to Ecuador, in the last qualification Colombia won 2-0 (goals by James Rodríguez and Juan Guillermo Cuadrado) and in the previous one they fell 1-0 (note by Christian Benítez, who died in 2013).
Further behind are the goalless parity for South Africa 2010, the 2-1 defeat on the way to Germany 2006, the 0-0 for Korea and Japan in 2002 and the victory for Cita the most recent (for England 1966 Ecuador won 2-0, there was a 1-1 for Germany 1974 and another 0-0 for Italy 1990).
Read here: “This selection is very good emotionally”
In other words, out of nine games in the neighboring country, the national team obtained 37% of the points played, so it did not do as well as it is believed. Above the numbers and the antecedents, it is clear that Colombia will have to rely more on work than on talent, avoid the anxiety that was seen in Barranquilla and that was born from the desperation of an early goal (in short, I do not report in the opening minutes) and create the moment when there is no so that your last game of 2020 is more than decent.
Queiroz needs to target the collective heart to regain confidence, as well as be consistent in terms of names, patterns and operations and then, with that mix, contain a complicated rival and make what happened with Uruguay at the Metropolitan a painful anecdote, but ultimately a statistic for the future.
Of: Camilo Amaya
.
[ad_2]
Source link
