[ad_1]
The last season of “The Crown” was criticized in Britain – “totally biased”, “slanderous”, “vitriolic attack” against Prince Charles – and was accused of allowing himself too much freedom when He described a reality, the relationship of the heir to the throne with Princess Diana, which is still extremely alive in the memories of many inhabitants of this country, informs AFP on Friday.
The British have particularly criticized the way this successful Netflix series, which presents the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, describes the relationship between Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, and his first wife, Princess Diana.
The fourth season of “The Crown” presents the moment of “Lady Di’s” entry into the British royal family: actress Emma Corrin plays the role of a lonely girlfriend, then that of an anxious wife in front of a cold and unfaithful, still in love with his first girlfriend, Camilla.
The creator of the series “The Crown”, Peter Morgan, took the fantasy part of this production, especially for the more intimate scenes, provoking an extensive exercise of “fact check” among the fans every season. But for many biographers of the monarchy and close relatives of the British royal family, this time around the British manufacturer has gone too far.
“The Crown” “makes Diana a victim and Charles a negative character, as they were both victims,” said indignant British royal history specialist Penny Junor.
In particular, he blames the fact that the series blamed Princess Diana’s bulimia on her marriage to Charles and that this production claims that Queen Elizabeth II’s eldest son continued to have an affair with Camilla soon after his marriage to Diana.
“The way Charles is portrayed is slander,” several friends of the British prince reported, according to the Times. The whole series is a “vitriolic attack” on Charles, added Dickie Arbiter, a former press officer at Buckingham Palace. In The Guardian newspaper, royal biographer Hugo Vickers also denounces a “totally biased” season of “The Crown”.
Affective load
For Ioannis Deroide, historian and author of “L’Angleterre en series”, the relationship between Prince Charles and Diana, presented in “The Crown”, remains “probable”. In the opinion of this French writer, beyond the “truth” of each person, “the role played in the general dynamics of the royal family” is the most interesting aspect, and from this point of view the new season of “The Crown “has a very good performance.
Ioannis Deroide explains the virulent reaction of a part of the British public to the “emotional charge” that continues to surround the events presented in the new production. “In previous seasons, there was talk of old events and sometimes forgotten characters,” so the debates on truth were tied to the scale of “controversies between biographers,” said the French writer.
“But the new season is about recent things that have deeply affected the collective consciousness,” he said.
The failed marriage between Diana and Charles remains a very sensitive issue after the tragic death of the Princess of Wales in Paris in 1997. Since then, the heir to the British throne, who has since married Camilla, has managed to restore his public image.
Penny Junor regrets the approach used this season in “The Crown”, which she considers “extremely harmful” to the princely couple Charles-Camilla, who will one day reign in Britain: “So many people, both in the Great United Kingdom and the rest of the world will consider ‘The Crown’ a faithful testimony, but this production is not a true story, but a fiction. “
“Moral responsibility”
Mail on Sunday, the Sunday supplement of the Daily Mail, has launched a campaign asking Netflix to clarify that “The Crown” belongs to the realm of fictional productions.
On Sunday the publication was supported by British Culture Minister Oliver Dowden, who feared “that an entire generation of viewers who have not experienced those events might be confusing this fiction with reality.”
“The Crown” has a “moral responsibility” to ensure its audiences don’t confuse the series with a documentary, said famous British actress Helena Bonham Carter, who plays the British ruler’s sister. The same opinion was held by Princess Diana’s brother, Charles Spencer, who has no close relationship with the royal family.
“It’s a bit ridiculous,” Ioannis Deroide said. Despite the “impressive mimicry” of the sets and costumes, there is no risk, in his opinion, that the series will be considered a documentary, especially for the celebrity enjoyed by the actors distributed in this production.
“‘The Crown’ is just one element among many that allow Brits to compose their own vision of the royal family. I don’t think this series alone can make people say Charles is a charming guy or vice versa,” he added.
“The role of a series is by no means exact. Historians also practice reconstitution, because we can never reproduce the past,” added the French writer.
Source: Agerpres
Source link
