[ad_1]
The provocations of Francisco J Marques, due to Sporting’s first goal, against Moreirense, preceded by a foul, at the hands of Pote, deserve the comment of Miguel Braga this Monday on Sporting TV’s X-Ray program. “It is a warlike language that FC Porto communication is very fond of. People do not admit mistakes. We admit it. To err is human. Those who seem not to admit mistakes and seem to have never done anything important and, when they do, also do it on purpose is FC Porto “, he begins referring to the communication officer of the Alvalade club, alluding to a recent controversy, in which the dragons referred to the Leon club as Sporting … from Lisbon, following a involuntary exchange of dragon emblems.
Again with regard to the ‘mouths’ of FC Porto’s communications director, for which Sporting has 4 points more, due to referee errors, Miguel Braga has no doubts in saying that it is the replacement of a film shot at the end last century. “It is a culture of the 80s that FC Porto are bringing back to the fore. A culture of pressure on referees, journalists, in short, they primer lies and make other people tell lies to make us believe.” the officer in charge of Leon, not forgetting the president of Fabril do Barreiro, Faustino Mestre, who, at the end of the third round match of the Portuguese Cup, criticized the president of Sporting, praising the behavior of Pinto da Costa.
Related
Then Covid-19 played him a game, forced him to postpone a game with Sporting B and the reaction of the lions was tough, according to Miguel Braga. “If Fabril has players with Covid, he must not report him to Sporting. He must inform the association and the health authorities. If it is proven that his players have Covid, there is a direct consequence: the game is postponed. What Fabril, perhaps, I wanted to escape other health measures that the authorities impose. With so many infected players, perhaps the team must be quarantined. That’s what the law says, not Sporting “, accuses Leon’s official, returning this way back to FC Porto.
He received FC Porto with pomp and circumstance, he ended the game and the first thing he did was criticize the Sporting president, saying that he had never asked the public to return to the stadiums. It’s a blatant lie only made by someone who is doing a serve for FC Porto. It is understandable, he was feverish “, jokes Miguel Braga, adding even more to the communication bonfire:” It is interesting to see these complaints, when, afterwards, they rarely do mea culpa. a warlike narrative that makes them look poor and the whole world seems to hurt them a lot. It is very difficult for me to perceive a club the size of FC Porto to continue with this conversation. “
Before ending, Miguel Braga considered the investigation into the transfer of Mattheus Oliveira do Estoril to Sporting, emanating from the Cashball Process, which in practice “came to nothing” to be “not news”; rejected the idea that Eduardo Quaresma or Tiago Tomás could leave the club in January because they didn’t have room in the squad; he guaranteed that “in due course” the table of the Sporting general assembly will comment on the needs presented by the partner group led by Rui Mestre; and he was worried that Vasco Santos, the VAR of the game with Moreirense, could enter the “jar” in the next round.
“It’s a bit worrying that the referee who will end up in the ‘jarra’ is the referee who made the mistake in Pedro Gonçalves’ statement, because that’s not exactly what happened with some VARs who got it wrong. Marega kicks the leg of defender Marítimo and the referee shoots a penalty in favor of FC Porto: what worries this justice Solomon is to punish the referee who missed the Sporting match, head of the communication department of the Alvalade club.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
