[ad_1]
satisfy
A reporter is said to have shown the princess forged documents so that she could trust him and allow him to speak.
The interview went around the world. It was November 20, 1995, when Princess Diana granted the BBC that memorable conversation in which she accused Prince Charles of infidelity in front of an audience of millions: “There were three of us in this marriage – and it was a bit too much …” The interview was an embarrassment for the Palast and BBC man Martin Bashir became a journalistic celebrity overnight.
But now the princess’s brother Earl Spencer has made serious allegations against the BBC. Back then, Bashir stole his trust with false documents and thus access to his sister. The reporter spread lies about the royal family. For example, courtiers were paid to spy on the princess and thus specifically encouraged her sister’s distrust of the palace. As evidence, he presented bank statements which later turned out to be fake.
A few days ago the forger, a former BBC graphic artist named Matt Wiessler, publicly confirmed this process. Bashir actually showed up one evening in 1995 with the following request: “He told me that he urgently needed some bank statements for his work. It wasn’t unusual for me because I had to produce props like this from time to time for the shoot. He told me that unfortunately he could only describe the originals to me and refused to write or sketch anything. “
What time?
Martin Bashir still works for the BBC, but is on sick leave after heart surgery and is silent. The question also arises: Why did it take the princess’s brother 25 years to bring her allegations to the public?
She tweeted: “In fact, I’ve known for a long time that Martin Bashir was using forged documents at the time to get my sister to do this interview. On the other hand, I have only known for two weeks – thanks to the research of journalists – that the BBC was also aware of these events and has followed them over the years. This is why I am now addressing the public. “
If Bashir lied and cheated, it’s bad for him, but even more so for his employer. “There is a whole dark cloud hanging over the BBC. Earl Spencer’s allegations warrant an independent investigation. It needs to be clarified who did what and in particular knew who did what, otherwise the damage can no longer be controlled, ”says former BBC president and media entrepreneur Lord Grade.
The BBC announces an investigation
Meanwhile, the BBC also saw this and promised an investigation into the events. Not going to stick with this, the parliamentary media commission has announced that it will look into the outrageous events with its own investigation.
The collateral damage of this scandal should not be underestimated. Like most public service media houses, the BBC has come under enormous pressure in recent months. Conservative politicians want to cut their funding and are even playing with the abolition of broadcast taxes. So if it were true that the BBC betrayed Diana with fake documents, and that the broadcaster’s management at the time swept the matter under the rug, that would massively damage the BBC’s reputation at the worst possible moment.
Source link
