[ad_1]
The past few days have brought good news for the Ethereum community. Not only has ETH climbed in the rankings, climbing to $ 441 from a value of $ 382 just under a week ago, but the community has also welcomed the implementation of the deposit agreement for ETH 2.0. It goes without saying that optimism is skyrocketing, especially as these developments have come after months of anticipation, delays and online chatter.
However, as with most developments, the deployment of the deposit agreement also paved the way for another unusual take, this time, by Illia Polosukhin of the NEAR protocol which supported that despite all the progress, “Eth1 is not going anywhere”. Congratulating the developers behind the milestone, the NEAR protocol executive also announced monetary support for the development of OpenEthereum.
However, that’s not all. In fact, some in the community have even accused Polosukhin of spreading FUD after questioning the move from Ethereum 1.0 to Ethereum 2.0. Also, the executive supported that,
“There hasn’t been any development on OpenEthereum (formerly Parity) in the last 6 months. It is also damaging the decentralization of customers for Ethereum. “
Polosukhin’s claims weren’t taken well by most of the community, with some like Hudson Jameson of the Ethereum Foundation pointing out the “3 major inaccuracies” in the above thread.
As for Polosukhin’s claim that “it will not be possible to attempt to migrate Ethereum1 with all parties involved without breaking the chain for at least a few days”, Jameson She said that the same was patently false. While wondering if the former had spoken to the developers working on the project, Jameson also argued that contrary to Polosukhin’s claims, the Berlin hard fork was never “officially” scheduled for June 2020, adding that EIP-2537 it is not essential for Serenity.
Finally, the claim of the NEAR executive not to develop on OpenEthereum, an OE developer launched in stating,
“You checked the wrong repo. The OE team worked with the backport-3.1 repository (now renamed openethereum). We fixed bugs that the parity team had not fixed for years, as we have also implemented all the EIPS in Berlin.
Likewise, he replied,
“I didn’t realize there was another repo you just renamed.
Let’s get connected: I’d love to support the job! “
Jameson ended the aforementioned thread on a stern note, claiming that the executive hadn’t spoken to any OE developers before making his claims about his dormancy. Calling the team’s work “stellar,” Jameson said,
7/7 His thread wants to inspire FUD that many may fall in love with. I was actually starting to think that NEAR and Ethereum might be friendly and that NEAR had good intentions, but things like this from one of the most respected members of their community cancel that. Do better.
– Hudson Jameson (@hudsonjameson) November 6, 2020
[ad_2]Source link
