Is there a reconciliation of safe areas with the United States?



[ad_1]

This time the markets did not beat Trump.

Markets like elephants to enter Monday midnight connects the glassware shop "If the studio Kurds, we spoil Turkey as an economic", saying that Turkey is clearly evident threat twit that I am talking about the President of the United States.

On Monday morning, about six hours after that threatening turn, half hour before the opening of the threat, I had the pulse of a senior official in negotiations with the United States.

"How will you now? Do not force Turkey Economy cards" I ask such questions.

My safe and confident way, Muh They are trying to put psychological pressure, penalties etc. no, Olmaz said.

When we look at the mobility of the dollar in open markets in half an hour, there have been no serious reactions except small moves.

So the immersion in Trumpmamis's bodoslama did not cause panic.

This indicates that the name of the person I contacted was in response to the thesis that "the purpose was to create psychological pressure Bu.

Trump's statement that, except in Turkey menacing expression, then weeks, maybe there is a second factor that can stay on the agenda for months.

The idea of ​​a safe zone system is designed to be created at a depth of 20 miles or 32 kilometers.

WHY DO YOU HAVE NO REASONS FOR ANKARA?

Those who follow closely the developments concerning the east of Euphrates are well aware of the "safe zone", in other words, that the discussions on the Tampon area are not new.

For example, some time ago, while we were on duty, a conversation with a retired force commander interested in the Syrian file had already been the same topic.

2016 Americans have found a suggestion for Turkey, but Ankara immediately rejected the offer.

When I asked why he was rejected, withdrew from the commander of the force "Americans wanted a buffer zone under their control, which did not want to mix Turkey, so he quickly denied" I have the answer.

So, is the American proposal different from the previous one?

So, if Turkey's initiative in the 32-kilometer-deep safety zone activated if it clearly wants to be built?

Or for another purpose?

ATTENTION TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE PRESIDENT

There was a widespread belief that the Americans' heads had worked on a different frequency until that day.

According to this logic, such a project was designed to prevent the Turks from damaging the Kurds (which we understand as YPG).

It was also no secret that numerous attempts had been made to transfer that area to a number of common Arab forces through the Minister for Foreign Affairs Pompey.

There's a reason why I use Bu past in these last sentences.

This is what he says:

The speech by President Tayyip Erdoğan yesterday to the parliamentary group and the statements he used to answer journalists' questions indicate a new situation.

Erdogan made a phone call with Trump on Monday evening.

Erdogan's comments on how this problem is handled give an idea.

Let's take a look at those critical words:

"Syria along the border with Turkey to create from us safe area was expressed by Trump himself as 20 mph.That is more than 30 kilometers deep in a safe area Ki

The most important emphasis of the president's words is the creation of security zones by Turkey & # 39; finds its expression in return.

From this statement, it is also possible to make sense of the fact that a certain consensus was reached with Trump on this problem.

If Trump really does it, and Trump does not start broadcasting again at another frequency three days later, or if his team does not undertake a new indoctrination, Erdogan Eğer's words I believe we have reached an understanding of the historical significance with Trump üç it will be of great value.

ANKARA CONDITION FOR THE IDEA OF THE SECURE REGION

Erdogan's claims on the security zone are reversed and a meaningful assessment is made.

This is;

In which case the president of the safe zone project proposed by Trump's happening with these words expressed that it would mean the acceptance of Turkey.

More precisely, "We are positive about this idea, but only if Turkey undertake this work" we are giving the message.

If this project is realized in such a way that we can really accept this in Ankara, the president of the New York Times stated in a newspaper article found in the Turkey plan it can be easily adapted.

But if you do not, the business logic of YPG to remove Turkey from the destination area for this purpose together with another & # 39; if buffer forces & # 39; bites intention, work will not be easy to walk.

[ad_2]
Source link