Highlights of the Founder of the Dirt Protocol Because the Blockchain dApps still can not take off

[ad_2][ad_1]
Highlights of the Founder of the Dirt Protocol Because the Blockchain dApps still can not take off

Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology have made many promises in recent years, and the biggest has been a decentralized future. The biggest problem here is that they promised that such a future would come very soon, and Development of dApp it started as the first step towards achieving it.

However, the problem lies in the fact that none of them has been very successful. The so-called "killers" have never arrived, which is both interesting and problematic, considering the amount of money and talent that had already been used for this purpose. Recently, many have begun to wonder why the trend has not taken off?

These days the process of creating and launching dApp is considered interrupted. Much has to do with a pre-release overhype and the app simply can not meet user expectations. Over time, the developers of dApp have made some assumptions and since then have followed a certain set of rules and hypotheses, which are wrong in their core.

For example, the white paper, to which developers tend to stick, should be considered as a starting point and not a final plan for the product. Furthermore, decentralization is only a means to an end and not the answer to all the problems we are facing today.

In short, dApps was another failure in 2018 and many are hoping that things will change in 2019 and in later years. To do this, developers need to keep some things in mind.

1) Missing use cases

Despite the fact that philosophy has been one of the driving factors of cryptography, as it has expanded the mind of users about what is possible, it is not enough when it comes to the creation of dApp. Many projects have made unrealistic promises, and it is only now that they are starting to make it happen. The end user does not need much in terms of decentralization and openness of the project, these are the things that matter to developers.

What users really need is an app that has an actual use case. Many believe that developers should start from the beginning and get back to basics. They need to understand who their users are, what problems they are facing and how an app can help solve them.

2) Combine user feedback with caution

One of the problems in meeting the needs of your users is to understand what these needs are. Many believe that the best way to deal with it is to ask the community and work on their feedback. While logical, this method does not work, as users typically do not know what they want or need.

Historically, a lot of big decisions made by successful companies like Facebook, Netflix and many others have been made against the wishes of users. In fact, some of these decisions have even been considered very controversial. At the time the public response was extremely negative, but users have still become accustomed to the changes and now they can not imagine that these services are otherwise.

Simply put, it's important to get user feedback, but following their advice is not always the best line of action. Users do not know what they want and so it is up to developers to find the best way to move forward.

3) The idea is a beginning, not the goal

As mentioned, there is an incorrect assumption that the idea itself is crucial to the success of the project. This is why many projects tend to present a white paper and stick to it after beginning with development.

However, many problems tend to appear during development and instead of adapting, development teams continue to try to achieve the initial goal, despite the fact that a major obstacle is on their way. This leads to multiple delays, which make the project users lose hope.

App, services and centralized businesses are doing things differently, and although not all of them are successful, many of them do it, which is not something that happens to dApps. In particular, in 2018, crypto exchanges and mining gear manufacturers blew up, while dApps remain under the radar.

Of course, the risks are great and the developers aim to provide a complete product that is also completely safe to use. However, experts suggest a different approach – releasing smaller products that can be launched first. So, after exposing it to a small group of users, developers can get feedback and continue working to refine the app.

2018 was not perfect, but there is a lot of valuable material that can be used to learn and improve the dApp creation process. This is why hope for success still exists, but will require some changes and a return to basics.

[ad_2]Source link